I setup a backup system for a lawyer last year. Its basically a cron job that runs a script every night. It uses duplicity + gpg and stores everything on amazon s3. Its incredibly cheap. I store 6 months of revisions, with a full backup on the first weekend of every month, then incrementals after that. I perform regular restores and run a big md5sum job to ensure that the restores are working. I havent automated that stage of it yet, but so far so good. I'd be happy to send you the scripts if you want. PM me if youre interested.
Yeah ive been running cacti and nagios for a year now and Nagios seems a little superior to this monitoring prog. The grapher is just an RRD poller, same as cacti it seems. Have you tried cacti or nagios as well?
OSX requires SSE2/SSE3 which is only found with Intel. So is Apple planning to emulate these features? I dont see how they could release with intel only support without alot of people getting mad.
I seriously do not see how a cellphone's weak radiation is going to affect a GPS device. Keep in mind that a GPS receiver is just a device that receives timestamps from many different sources at once and then triangulates a position based on the time differences between all the sources it is monitoring. So you are saying that a cellphone is delaying these signals more than just the distance between the receiver and the source alone? I seriously do not buy this at all. If this were the case, then you would never be allowed to use portable electronics during the duration of the flight, let alone takeoff and landing -- and its always portable... what about those CRT TVs they have on big planes?! I KNOW THOSE EMIT RADIATION!!!
I am a firm believer in the fact that the real reason you cannot use portable electronics during TAKEOFF and LANDING is that the crew wants you to be able to hear them in case of emergency.
Think about it.
None of you are concerned about government backed software? I for one would not trust the privacy of a government funded operating system. The gov't's possibilities would become endless and possibly totally hidden from the public.
Things like this: Your Rights Online: Carnegie Mellon Resists FBI Tapping Requirement would all of a sudden be a non issue -- there would be no preventing it.
As brilliant an idea this is, and it is a great one, i dont think the privacy conscious public would back it.
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/bayeux.htm
I think this is foreshadowing some kinda tech war... Intel invades AMD's corporate offices? More on this story as it unfolds...
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah Im not sure either... whats your email?
I setup a backup system for a lawyer last year. Its basically a cron job that runs a script every night. It uses duplicity + gpg and stores everything on amazon s3. Its incredibly cheap. I store 6 months of revisions, with a full backup on the first weekend of every month, then incrementals after that. I perform regular restores and run a big md5sum job to ensure that the restores are working. I havent automated that stage of it yet, but so far so good. I'd be happy to send you the scripts if you want. PM me if youre interested.
Yeah ive been running cacti and nagios for a year now and Nagios seems a little superior to this monitoring prog. The grapher is just an RRD poller, same as cacti it seems. Have you tried cacti or nagios as well?
OSX requires SSE2/SSE3 which is only found with Intel. So is Apple planning to emulate these features? I dont see how they could release with intel only support without alot of people getting mad.
I seriously do not see how a cellphone's weak radiation is going to affect a GPS device. Keep in mind that a GPS receiver is just a device that receives timestamps from many different sources at once and then triangulates a position based on the time differences between all the sources it is monitoring. So you are saying that a cellphone is delaying these signals more than just the distance between the receiver and the source alone? I seriously do not buy this at all. If this were the case, then you would never be allowed to use portable electronics during the duration of the flight, let alone takeoff and landing -- and its always portable... what about those CRT TVs they have on big planes?! I KNOW THOSE EMIT RADIATION!!! I am a firm believer in the fact that the real reason you cannot use portable electronics during TAKEOFF and LANDING is that the crew wants you to be able to hear them in case of emergency. Think about it.
None of you are concerned about government backed software? I for one would not trust the privacy of a government funded operating system. The gov't's possibilities would become endless and possibly totally hidden from the public.
Things like this:
Your Rights Online: Carnegie Mellon Resists FBI Tapping Requirement
would all of a sudden be a non issue -- there would be no preventing it. As brilliant an idea this is, and it is a great one, i dont think the privacy conscious public would back it.
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/bayeux.htm I think this is foreshadowing some kinda tech war... Intel invades AMD's corporate offices? More on this story as it unfolds...