You might find useful information (concerning the first OpenMoko compatible phone) on this page : http://wiki.openmoko.org/index.php?title=Neo1973 The end user version is the one named "Phase 2" (GTA02, "Mass Market"). Allong with hardware specs, you'll find there an estimated timeline :
* Sep 20 - GTA02v3 design finalised.
* Oct 20 - GTA02v3 design produced, and shipped to qualified developers.
* Nov 20 - GTA02v3 design verified through testing by developers.
* Dec 10 - GTA02v3 produced in moderate volume
* Dec 20 - GTA02v3 goes on sale
* Dec 25 - GTA02v3 arrives
The news is pretty confusing.
After reading carefully the articles, I think that in fact only the last problem hasn't be fixed....But the author comment "Let's hope that these will be fixed soon" let people think that the 3 of them are still present....
I was wrong saying before that everything is fixed, but shouldn't we at last add something explaining that only ONE issue is not fixed....?
Do not know : does it deserve an update?
Shouldn't an update be posted to this news....It's quite biased, or false, for now. A simple "Update : This has been fixed in the last versions. " would do, no?
Slashdot Mirror
You might find useful information (concerning the first OpenMoko compatible phone) on this page : http://wiki.openmoko.org/index.php?title=Neo1973
The end user version is the one named "Phase 2" (GTA02, "Mass Market").
Allong with hardware specs, you'll find there an estimated timeline :
* Sep 20 - GTA02v3 design finalised.
* Oct 20 - GTA02v3 design produced, and shipped to qualified developers.
* Nov 20 - GTA02v3 design verified through testing by developers.
* Dec 10 - GTA02v3 produced in moderate volume
* Dec 20 - GTA02v3 goes on sale
* Dec 25 - GTA02v3 arrives
The news is pretty confusing. After reading carefully the articles, I think that in fact only the last problem hasn't be fixed....But the author comment "Let's hope that these will be fixed soon" let people think that the 3 of them are still present.... I was wrong saying before that everything is fixed, but shouldn't we at last add something explaining that only ONE issue is not fixed....? Do not know : does it deserve an update?
Shouldn't an update be posted to this news....It's quite biased, or false, for now. A simple "Update : This has been fixed in the last versions. " would do, no?
Humm...I guess I mixed it up with qutrit. Gonna check this ;)
Thx anyway to have warned me :)
Since qubit can have 3 states, I think that it can now count up to 3^5, ie 243 ;).
No ?