What about... what about... EATING A(N AMERICAN) FLAG?
Polygamy? Incest? Bestiality?
The intersection of religious and moral freedoms and others attitudes / general safety? Sub-millimetre scanning in the airport; carrying a kirpan; open carrying a gun; creating homemade explosives or chemical weapons; hate speech when not in the presence of targeted persons; hate speech on the Internet...?
... is a funny accusation from someone who keeps classifying disagreements as inferiority.
I have never done that, let alone done it repeatedly. Please do not lie.
Some people may take offense at having their arguments (to be fair you didn't say that they were, just their arguments) repeatedly called "nonsense", "pathetic", "silly", "untrue" as one-word responses to whatever they were trying to say. It projects the impression that you can quickly put-down what they were saying without the need/being bothered to respond more fully. To some people, this may give the implication that you think they are inferior for failing to come up with intriguing arguments. Granted, if that was not your intention, then it is not a fair response. However, people are often prone to irrational thinking and fallacy in debate.
I guess we must resort to addressing you rather than those lofty concepts of yours
Um. That is precisely what YOU did. Wow. Did you so quickly forget that you called me a "dictator," without any such ad hominem toward you by myself? Please do not be so incredibly dishonest.
To be fair, he PRECISELY said you would make a good dictator. I don't think anyone was calling you a dictator.
I don't think most liberals are that threatening:P Most are pretty hippy-ish.
Based on your posts here, civil rights and liberty - when taken to extreme - result in obviously untenable positions. I would go so far as to say most liberals and conservatives obviously don't believe in zealotry, because that's stupid. Everyone knows it's stupid, except zealots.
You seem like you're probably a reasonable guy at heart. However, you're the stereotypical (atypical Republican?/ typical Libertarian) who constantly needs to prove how smart you are.
Edit: See the post below me. It's much more eloquent.
I was going to respond earlier and say it could be shifted into Neutral. I think what the GP means is that it isn't a manual action. The shifter is an electronic control.
"Either way, it can be spun positively..."
So the PR folk are protons?
No, silly. Spin is independent of charge....
Or is it... Hmm.. what about a spin-charge unified thing of physics! Nobel Prize here I come. After my degree. And then in ten years. And then after being peer-reviewed. And then after my paper is proven correct. Better hope I don't get smacked by a Prius first, they don't award it posthumously.
Because, even with catastrophic failures, computers are way, way better at making reliable decisions than humans.
If we had fully automated personal and mass transportation with well-thought out safety features (ex. doors on the train platform to prevent people pushing others onto the tracks), far fewer people would die. Again, even with catastrophic failures. Period.
As another poster said, there have been 400 000+ automotive deaths in N.A. not related to the Toyota acceleration, which was 56.
On hand hand this is malignant censorship, the forebode to a society with no free information. On the other hand, this is 4chan.....
First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member...
Then they came for... well, they didn't come for anyone else. There wasn't really a good, next logical step in the continuum. The rest of the Internet was safe. Story over.
Just as Carbon Dioxide traps heat on Earth is an unproven, yet indisputable fact...
Yes, it's completely unproven, except for the millions of spectra taken of the molecule, which show its resonance in the infrared part of the spectrum.
To add to your correction; without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's surface would be completely frozen based on how much subsurface energy comes from the core and how much from sunlight. These values we know fairly accurately.
http://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/ees/climate/lectures/radiation/
Slashdot Mirror
What about... what about... EATING A(N AMERICAN) FLAG?
Polygamy? Incest? Bestiality?
The intersection of religious and moral freedoms and others attitudes / general safety? Sub-millimetre scanning in the airport; carrying a kirpan; open carrying a gun; creating homemade explosives or chemical weapons; hate speech when not in the presence of targeted persons; hate speech on the Internet...?
... is a funny accusation from someone who keeps classifying disagreements as inferiority.
I have never done that, let alone done it repeatedly. Please do not lie.
Some people may take offense at having their arguments (to be fair you didn't say that they were, just their arguments) repeatedly called "nonsense", "pathetic", "silly", "untrue" as one-word responses to whatever they were trying to say. It projects the impression that you can quickly put-down what they were saying without the need/being bothered to respond more fully. To some people, this may give the implication that you think they are inferior for failing to come up with intriguing arguments. Granted, if that was not your intention, then it is not a fair response. However, people are often prone to irrational thinking and fallacy in debate.
I guess we must resort to addressing you rather than those lofty concepts of yours
Um. That is precisely what YOU did. Wow. Did you so quickly forget that you called me a "dictator," without any such ad hominem toward you by myself? Please do not be so incredibly dishonest.
To be fair, he PRECISELY said you would make a good dictator. I don't think anyone was calling you a dictator.
However, you're the stereotypical (atypical Republican?/ typical Libertarian) who constantly needs to prove how smart you are.
You're a typical smug person who feels "above it all" who resorts to mere ad hominem when he hasn't any actual arguments.
From the (great)-grandparent post...
Typical liberal. You simply do not believe in civil rights or liberty, by your own admission. You only believe in what you think people should have.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror
I don't think most liberals are that threatening :P Most are pretty hippy-ish.
Based on your posts here, civil rights and liberty - when taken to extreme - result in obviously untenable positions. I would go so far as to say most liberals and conservatives obviously don't believe in zealotry, because that's stupid. Everyone knows it's stupid, except zealots.
You seem like you're probably a reasonable guy at heart. However, you're the stereotypical (atypical Republican?/ typical Libertarian) who constantly needs to prove how smart you are.
Edit: See the post below me. It's much more eloquent.
Why would you? They're paid for...
The rubber dingy really makes more of a brzzzrt noise...
Reform? Reminds me of that Simpsons scene in the UN.
"Soviet Union... we thought you guys broke up?!"
"That's what we wanted you guys to think!"
And the maintenance is a nightmare. Especially in cities that have multiple freeze-thaw cycles a year...
Out of curiosity, do you pay these private companies directly, or does the government pay them?
Where in Canada do you live?
Isn't the idea of a society that we pool resources for mutual good, even if we don't help everyone all the time?
You're dead-on about the debt though. The Liberals were paying it down, too bad the Conservatives haven't figured out how to do that...
You are quite sure the problem doesn't exist between the chair and the pedals?
Depends on the height of the person.
I was going to respond earlier and say it could be shifted into Neutral. I think what the GP means is that it isn't a manual action. The shifter is an electronic control.
No, silly. Spin is independent of charge. ...
Or is it... Hmm.. what about a spin-charge unified thing of physics! Nobel Prize here I come. After my degree. And then in ten years. And then after being peer-reviewed. And then after my paper is proven correct. Better hope I don't get smacked by a Prius first, they don't award it posthumously.
Because, even with catastrophic failures, computers are way, way better at making reliable decisions than humans.
If we had fully automated personal and mass transportation with well-thought out safety features (ex. doors on the train platform to prevent people pushing others onto the tracks), far fewer people would die. Again, even with catastrophic failures. Period.
As another poster said, there have been 400 000+ automotive deaths in N.A. not related to the Toyota acceleration, which was 56.
Mugabe, is that you?
Well, ... Windows 7 for 128-bit Systems isn't listed, so there!
is Probertly right.
is Probertly right?
Fist post!
I come to /. to read tech news... not so see people fisting.
Mod points are so fleeting..
I agree, but does your example hold up? They still only broke even by selling one copy because you didn't pay for yours... :P ?
It's a trick! The candy is free at first, then they jack up the price when you renew your subscription!
First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member...
Then they came for... well, they didn't come for anyone else. There wasn't really a good, next logical step in the continuum. The rest of the Internet was safe. Story over.
More than once I have seen very suspicious looking porn there [YouTube]
Just e-mail YouTube. They'll be lucky to have you search it out for them.
On the other hand, this is 4chan.....
Exactly. 4chan is blocked, and nothing of value was lost.
Also, CO2 is a plant food.
CO2 levels were high when the Dinos were around. High CO2 levels meant plenty of plants, for herbivores to eat, giving carnivores plenty to eat.
Yeah. And it was also really warm. I wonder if there could possibly be a link...
Yes, it's completely unproven, except for the millions of spectra taken of the molecule, which show its resonance in the infrared part of the spectrum.
To add to your correction; without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's surface would be completely frozen based on how much subsurface energy comes from the core and how much from sunlight. These values we know fairly accurately. http://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/ees/climate/lectures/radiation/