In this case the exploit was regarding a vulnerability on consumer personal data. Publishing it is a mean to force the webmaster protect sensitive consumer information, so it is a good thing (in the long term).
People ought to be informed when they use sites that are not secure, it is fair to all users.
Damn right ! This must be France, I assume, and these moron judges don't have a clue what they rule about. I used altern.org (and still do for email), this used to be a great service.
Slashdot Mirror
In this case the exploit was regarding a vulnerability on consumer personal data. Publishing it is a mean to force the webmaster protect sensitive consumer information, so it is a good thing (in the long term). People ought to be informed when they use sites that are not secure, it is fair to all users.
Damn right ! This must be France, I assume, and these moron judges don't have a clue what they rule about. I used altern.org (and still do for email), this used to be a great service.