I run libranet 2.7 on my pentium 233mhz laptop with 96MB ram with IceWM.
Opera 8 and GIMP start in half time of that of my wifes WinXP laptop (Athlon XP 1600+ 640MB ram). No mather what I trow on it is stays a life, I also found that MPEG playback is much faster than under Win98SE (dual boot).
Here is the Half-Life 2 benchmark: http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/cpu/article. php/3261_3484631__7
FX-55 is about 20% faster, also here:
http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=fx5 7&page=6&cookie_test=1
you can find that FX-57 is about 10% faster than FX-55, which gives at least 30% lead ahead of P4 965 EE.
AMD's Athlon 64 is 36% faster than Pentium 965 EE in UT2004 http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&m odel1=238&chart=71&model2=329
Is Intel's new Core 2 Extreme only as fast as AMD's FX-57?
I run libranet 2.7 on my pentium 233mhz laptop with 96MB ram with IceWM. Opera 8 and GIMP start in half time of that of my wifes WinXP laptop (Athlon XP 1600+ 640MB ram). No mather what I trow on it is stays a life, I also found that MPEG playback is much faster than under Win98SE (dual boot).
Unless you use WDX you may not be able to detect low concentrations.
Try Libranet, very easy to install.