Why should the gov't be responsible be people not raising their kids right. i agree with you that your LB shouldnt be playing that kind of a game, but what more can the gov't do to prevent this. they cant send someone out to watch over every parents shoulder and when a parent lets their kid do something that they shoudnt, that man cant be there to slap the parents fingers and tell them "no!" the government can not control the way that parents raise their kids, it all comes down to old fashion parenting.
i thought that the ratings system was a law restricting the sale of certain games to minors. i guess that im wrong though. i think that some of these laws are going too far in trying to protect these kids. i mean i know that they shouldnt be seeing someone get cut to peices or get a lap dance, but where are the parents when their kids are doing this stuff. maybe im missing something because im not a parent myself, but we cant just keep making laws to try and protect these kids from this stuff. There has to be some point where the mother of father just says no you cant have this. and if the kid goes somewhere else and plays this game then the parent should have every right to bend that kid over his/her knee and whip their ass. there are better, more efficent ways to raise these kids instead of wasting tax money so these guys can meet and decide that the stores need to put up a sign.
Netscape 5 was begun and the source released. The Mozilla open-source project was formed. They took a look at the Netscape 5 source, and gave up on it, deciding to start over. Although the Mozilla "suite" was made to work/look like Netscape, it was new code.
ok thats what i was mistaken on. i remember reading that once but i couldnt remember everything about it.
If im not mistaken isnt firefox based off of netscape in the first place? why dont they just play together and make an uber sweet browser. (not saying that firefox isnt a good one)
Slashdot Mirror
Why should the gov't be responsible be people not raising their kids right. i agree with you that your LB shouldnt be playing that kind of a game, but what more can the gov't do to prevent this. they cant send someone out to watch over every parents shoulder and when a parent lets their kid do something that they shoudnt, that man cant be there to slap the parents fingers and tell them "no!" the government can not control the way that parents raise their kids, it all comes down to old fashion parenting.
i thought that the ratings system was a law restricting the sale of certain games to minors. i guess that im wrong though. i think that some of these laws are going too far in trying to protect these kids. i mean i know that they shouldnt be seeing someone get cut to peices or get a lap dance, but where are the parents when their kids are doing this stuff. maybe im missing something because im not a parent myself, but we cant just keep making laws to try and protect these kids from this stuff. There has to be some point where the mother of father just says no you cant have this. and if the kid goes somewhere else and plays this game then the parent should have every right to bend that kid over his/her knee and whip their ass. there are better, more efficent ways to raise these kids instead of wasting tax money so these guys can meet and decide that the stores need to put up a sign.
Netscape 5 was begun and the source released. The Mozilla open-source project was formed. They took a look at the Netscape 5 source, and gave up on it, deciding to start over. Although the Mozilla "suite" was made to work/look like Netscape, it was new code. ok thats what i was mistaken on. i remember reading that once but i couldnt remember everything about it.
If im not mistaken isnt firefox based off of netscape in the first place? why dont they just play together and make an uber sweet browser. (not saying that firefox isnt a good one)
change your os to linux and not have to worry that much about security in the first place?
If they eliminated the FUD in FUDcon, then wouldnt it just be called "con"?