There are at least 9 security flaws in.NET. The paper conveniently dismisses them all as not being part of the framework even though Microsoft classifies them as such on their Knowledge Base. This is only to justify their pretty little chart in the introduction showing that.NET has zero security flaws.
If.NET has zero security flaws... nevermind. The paper is deception.
Are my beliefs slanted, or does noone care when the NY Times tells a bold faced lie?
Refering to the Social Security Program: "The program is a model of efficiency; expenses are low, as pension plans go, and participation is near universal."
Anyone who refers to a government program as a "model of efficiency" clearly has a political agenda. "Participation is near universal" because if you don't participate, you go to prison. The American government has already spent the money that my great grandchildren will have to pay in taxes.
How can we force term limits on congress without a French-style revolution?
Slashdot Mirror
There are at least 9 security flaws in .NET. The paper conveniently dismisses them all as not being part of the framework even though Microsoft classifies them as such on their Knowledge Base. This is only to justify their pretty little chart in the introduction showing that .NET has zero security flaws.
If .NET has zero security flaws... nevermind. The paper is deception.
Refering to the Social Security Program: "The program is a model of efficiency; expenses are low, as pension plans go, and participation is near universal."
Anyone who refers to a government program as a "model of efficiency" clearly has a political agenda.
"Participation is near universal" because if you don't participate, you go to prison. The American government has already spent the money that my great grandchildren will have to pay in taxes.
How can we force term limits on congress without a French-style revolution?