I believe that AMD64 is the right way to go. Not just because I am an AMD guy, but because it is fair.
AMD created the spec, and Intel copied it. Give credit where credit is due.
Sounds like an Intel commercial. All we need is the annoyning bing, bing, bing, bing at the end.
Hyper-Threading is really a poor-man's dual core. So why would anyone need Hyper-Threading when you actually have dual-core in the next 6 months?
SSE3 is actually useful, and as it has been pointed out, is coming very soon to AMD64.
Slashdot Mirror
I believe that AMD64 is the right way to go. Not just because I am an AMD guy, but because it is fair. AMD created the spec, and Intel copied it. Give credit where credit is due.
Sounds like an Intel commercial. All we need is the annoyning bing, bing, bing, bing at the end. Hyper-Threading is really a poor-man's dual core. So why would anyone need Hyper-Threading when you actually have dual-core in the next 6 months? SSE3 is actually useful, and as it has been pointed out, is coming very soon to AMD64.