Why doesn't someone patent the technique of issuing frivolous lawsuits and injunctions as a mathod to restrain free trade and exchange of "obvious" encryption or flawed encryption techniques.
The Patent Office seems in the mood to issue patents for just about anything these days.
Wouldn't a self perpetuating palandrome of a lawsuit be a wonderful achievement? Just imagine we could call it a "lawsuit bomb" and tie up the courts for years.. perhaps with luck the legal system will collapse under its own weight, or have to commit serious "self" impose surgery to excise such banal activities and "immunize" itself from brain dead measures from unqualified lawyers.
Wow.. maybe lawyers will be required to pass an I.Q. test before taking the bar exam..
Slashdot Mirror
This seems to have been done enough times.
Why doesn't someone patent the technique
of issuing frivolous lawsuits and injunctions
as a mathod to restrain free trade and
exchange of "obvious" encryption or flawed
encryption techniques.
The Patent Office seems in the mood to issue
patents for just about anything these days.
Wouldn't a self perpetuating palandrome of a
lawsuit be a wonderful achievement? Just imagine
we could call it a "lawsuit bomb" and tie up the
courts for years.. perhaps with luck the legal
system will collapse under its own weight, or have
to commit serious "self" impose surgery to excise
such banal activities and "immunize" itself
from brain dead measures from unqualified lawyers.
Wow.. maybe lawyers will be required to pass an
I.Q. test before taking the bar exam..
One can dream can't they?