I recently received a letter from this company,
click on Important Customer alert
http://www.tjx.com/index.html
They told me that my vcredit card number was stolen by criminals
This is explanation why it was impossible to fight child porn charge in Minnesota Minnesota supreme court reviewed recently child porn law. They declared unconstitutional only part of law. Law can not be partly unconstitutional, like woman can not be partly pregnant I read Supreme court decision at http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/supct/07 02/opa050811-0208.htm They declared unconstitutional only subsection 8 which said "Subd. 8. Affirmative defense. It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating this section that the pornographic work was produced using only persons who were 18 years or older." Government must prove age people in porn pictures, not a defendant,according with this decision. Supreme court said that this was harmless error, because it was clear just by looking at faces these were minors. This sound like 'we all know what child porn is, are we?' Modern computer technology can create any faces and cut and paste to adult porn. No computer expert can tell the difference ( US Supreme court struck down child porn law in 2002 based on this argument )
Arguments by court looks unprofessional, there was no real computer forensic specialists and experts. Also why state should not prove there was not spyware, porn pop ups, trojan horses. Too many holes in Supreme court decision. I am not a lawyer, but it is clear for me. This is very grey area of existing law. Judges just do not understand how computer works, and that everything is possible in digital world.
I would like to send you some links to publications
about my criminal case. I worked for Mitsubishi
Electric Automation in Vernon Hills, IL, USA.
My case are getting public attention now as an example
of miscarriage of justice. I could not defend myself,
because I did not have enough money for computer
expert. I was forced to confess for possession of
child porn. I got browser hijackers while browsing the
web. I was redirected to illigal sites against my
will. Some illigal pictures were found on my hard
drive only after
recovering in unallocated clusters, without dates of
files creation/download.
I do not know how can courts press widely on people to
convict them, while whole Internet is a mess.
This is my story in inquisition21.com. There is all
information about case written by Irish writer Brian
Rothery.
http://www.inquisition21.com/article~view~7~page_n um~3.html
This is publication in Wired news
http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,633 91,00.html
This is publication in Theregester
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/13/browser_hi jacking_risks/
Article in Globe and Mail newspaper
http://ctv.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040617.gttwhijac17/tech/Technology/techBN/ctv-t echnology
Article in ZDnet
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5344831.html
This is article in Washington Times, May 22, 2004
There is information about my case.
http://www.cato.org/cgi-bin/scripts/printtech.cgi/ dailys/05-30-04.html
Article in Crime research center:
http://www.crime-research.org/news/07.22.2004/506/
Article in Dallas, TX Newspaper
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=13614767 &BRD=1426&PAG=461&dept_id=528214&rfi=6
This article was published by Fox news journalist. The numbers may be wrong but this is alarming thing. http://www.ifeminists.net/e107_plugins/content/con tent.php?content.185
If we ban all porn, we will have tens of millions cases - major industry and employer.
I recently received a letter from this company, click on Important Customer alert http://www.tjx.com/index.html They told me that my vcredit card number was stolen by criminals
I would like to send you some links to publications about my criminal case. I was forced to confess to the possession of internet digital pictures of porn in deleted clusters of my computer hard drive. My browser was hijacked while I was browsing the web. I was redirected to illegal sites against my will. Some illegal pictures were found on my hard drive, recovering in unallocated clusters, without dates of file creation/download. I do not know how courts can widely press these charges on people to convict them, while the whole Internet is a mess. This is my story in inquisition21.com. There is all information about case written by Irish writer Brian Rothery. You can see a lot of violations of law by police http://www.inquisition21.com/article~view~7~page_n um~3.html
This is publication in Wired news
http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,633 91,00.html
This is publication in Theregester
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/13/browser_hi jacking_risks/
Article in Globe and Mail newspaper
http://ctv.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM .20040617.gttwhijac17/tech/Technology/techBN/ctv-t echnology
Article in ZDnet
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5344831.html
This is article in Washington Times, May 22, 2004
There is information about my case.
http://www.cato.org/cgi-bin/scripts/printtech.cgi/ dailys/05-30-04.html
Article in Crime research center:
http://www.crime-research.org/news/07.22.2004/506/
Article in Dallas, TX Newspaper
http://www.crime-research.org/news/24.12.2004/862/
Child porn law was declared unconstitutional in Hennepin County, Minnesota, USA'
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=11750
"I came here to the US as political refugee from the former Soviet
Union, and, now like many other people in the US, I feel shame that
all of this can happen in the US - supposed to be the greatest
democracy in the world."
This is explanation why it was impossible to fight child porn charge7 02/opa050811-0208.htm
in Minnesota
Minnesota supreme court reviewed recently child porn law.
They declared unconstitutional only part of law.
Law can not be partly unconstitutional, like woman can not be partly pregnant
I read Supreme court decision at
http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/supct/0
They declared unconstitutional only subsection 8 which said
"Subd. 8. Affirmative defense. It shall be an affirmative defense to a
charge of violating this section that the pornographic work was
produced using only persons who were 18 years or older."
Government must prove age people in porn pictures, not a
defendant,according with this decision.
Supreme court said that this was harmless error, because it was clear
just by looking at faces these were minors. This sound like 'we all
know what child porn is, are we?'
Modern computer technology can create any faces and cut and paste to adult porn.
No computer expert can tell the difference ( US Supreme court struck
down child porn law in 2002 based on this argument )
Arguments by court looks unprofessional, there was no real computer
forensic specialists and experts. Also why state should not prove
there was not spyware,
porn pop ups, trojan horses.
Too many holes in Supreme court decision. I am not a lawyer, but it is
clear for me.
This is very grey area of existing law. Judges just do not understand
how computer works,
and that everything is possible in digital world.
I would like to send you some links to publications about my criminal case. I worked for Mitsubishi Electric Automation in Vernon Hills, IL, USA. My case are getting public attention now as an example of miscarriage of justice. I could not defend myself, because I did not have enough money for computer expert. I was forced to confess for possession of child porn. I got browser hijackers while browsing the web. I was redirected to illigal sites against my will. Some illigal pictures were found on my hard drive only after recovering in unallocated clusters, without dates of files creation/download. I do not know how can courts press widely on people to convict them, while whole Internet is a mess. This is my story in inquisition21.com. There is all information about case written by Irish writer Brian Rothery. http://www.inquisition21.com/article~view~7~page_n um~3.html
This is publication in Wired news
http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,633 91,00.html
This is publication in Theregester
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/13/browser_hi jacking_risks/
Article in Globe and Mail newspaper
http://ctv.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM .20040617.gttwhijac17/tech/Technology/techBN/ctv-t echnology
Article in ZDnet
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5344831.html
This is article in Washington Times, May 22, 2004
There is information about my case.
http://www.cato.org/cgi-bin/scripts/printtech.cgi/ dailys/05-30-04.html
Article in Crime research center:
http://www.crime-research.org/news/07.22.2004/506/
Article in Dallas, TX Newspaper
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=13614767 &BRD=1426&PAG=461&dept_id=528214&rfi=6