Slashdot Mirror


User: rochrist

rochrist's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,132
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,132

  1. Re:Racism or Thought Police? on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    It's a franchise.

  2. Re:So what's the problem here? on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    Your math is suspect, but in any case, all I have to say is, poor baby. Maybe you shouldn't own a public basketball team if you're going to be a racist fuck. My heart does not bleed for him.

  3. Re:pishaw on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that would work just swell with advertisers leaving in droves, and players refusing to play. You're being foolish. He's a public figure, and he held a FRANCHISE. The very nature of a franchise is it can be taken away.

  4. Re:pishaw on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    But they did. THAT'S THE POINT. Once it became public, the league had to act. It doesn't matter HOW it became public, they still had to act.

  5. Re:Racism or Thought Police? on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    His property wasn't fucking confiscated.

  6. Re:Racism or Thought Police? on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    It wasn't a phone call.

  7. Re:So what's the problem here? on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    And he wasn't charged with a crime. He lost a franchise because the corporation the franchise /belongs/ to felt he was harming their brand.

  8. Re:So what's the problem here? on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    What the fuck is inadequate about 2 BILLION dollars??

  9. Re:So what's the problem here? on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    Yes, because at 83 he has so long to let it appreciate!

  10. Re:pishaw on The Ethics Cloud Over Ballmer's $2 Billion B-Ball Buy · · Score: 1

    I'm sure all of the players on the Clippers would have been happy to ignore it. Or maybe, they all would have been running for the exits before next season leaving the NBA with the embarrassing situation of having a team with no players to, you know, actually play the games. Once this became public, there was no way on earth the league could avoid taking action.

  11. Re:Since when does Qt "work" with OS X? on Apple Announces New Programming Language Called Swift · · Score: 1

    He keeps ignoring Maya which has been brought up several times.

  12. Re:Fuck off and Die in a Fire on Ask Slashdot: Taking a New Tack On Net Neutrality? · · Score: 1

    Has anybody actually been stupid enough to try this before?

  13. Re:Books aren't special on Amazon Confirms Hachette Spat Is To "Get a Better Deal" · · Score: 1

    So..you're an idiot, is that what you're saying?

  14. Re:Fight for consumers on Amazon Confirms Hachette Spat Is To "Get a Better Deal" · · Score: 1

    Record companies and publishers are not the same and don't serve the same function.

  15. Re:Time to become a better shopper on Amazon Confirms Hachette Spat Is To "Get a Better Deal" · · Score: 1

    Uh, no. Amazon is already drowning me in a sea of shitty, halfassed selfpublished garbage.

  16. Re:It is more subtle than thatRe:Books aren't spec on Amazon Confirms Hachette Spat Is To "Get a Better Deal" · · Score: 1

    This. The Kindle is drowning in a sea of horsecrap, and Amazon makes it VERY hard to sort the wheat from the chaff. And you're right, the online reviews are utterly useless for the most part. I've encountered ebooks with 4.5-5 star ratings that would fail as sixth grade writing projects. Really embarrassing stuff.

  17. Re:Books aren't special on Amazon Confirms Hachette Spat Is To "Get a Better Deal" · · Score: 2

    Are you deliberately being obtuse? If I want a book by, say, Charlie Stross, a book by Stephanie Meyer is not going to do. If I want a microware, I don't give a fuck whether it's from Samsung, Panasonic, Sharp or Whirlpool. Books are not widgets. Each one is a unique, bespoke item.

  18. Re:How does Amazon have a monopoly on ebooks? on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    That's great for GRR Martin. Not so great for new or midlist authors perhaps. Hardly anybody will go to 20 different websites to get their books.

  19. Re:Amazon Store on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    antipope is him.

  20. Re:Do we really need new books? on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    Quite a few really awful books are available for free without pirating them. The business model for new-ish authors of genre fiction is to write the first novel for free and sell it for $0.00 on Amazon, then sell the sequels (self published or through a publisher). Unfortunately this model means fewer stand alone novels and more endless sagas. Fixed that for you.

  21. Re:Do we really need new books? on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and LotR took 30 years to write for exactly that reason.

  22. Re:Do we really need new books? on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    He's certainly better than Herbert.

  23. Re:Do we really need new books? on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    Books are not widgets.

  24. Re:Sorry Charlie on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    They also aren't his publisher. They are a retail distributer for his publisher.

  25. Re:Read his books on Author Charles Stross: Is Amazon a Malignant Monopoly, Or Just Plain Evil? · · Score: 1

    A) you really don't know Charlie Stross, and B) if you think the publishers were stifling great literature, you haven't read much of the self-pubbed stuff.