> Except, of course, Apple, and possibly IBM/Lenovo.
IBM used to be very good. And had really good linux support. I'm unsure if that it's still true. Otherwise, Apple's laptops support for Linux is rather incomplete...
If _only_ taking the hardware into account, and for one willing to use Linux, I prefer a pricey IBM than a pricey Apple laptop.
> Except, of course, Apple, and possibly IBM/Lenovo. IBM used to be very good. And had really good linux support. I'm unsure if that it's still true. Otherwise, Apple's laptops support for Linux is rather incomplete... If _only_ taking the hardware into account, and for one willing to use Linux, I prefer a pricey IBM than a pricey Apple laptop.
Because it means that Redhat is doing a good job and they need to grow to be able to satisfy more clients.