Except that ShadowProtect is ridiculously expensive for small organisations, and the licensing is the biggest pain in the ass on earth (seriously? Dongles?!? Mandatory monthly rental?!?)
Until AWS collapses, like it's also done several times before. At which point you're screwed. Forget Amazon, they are years behind using your own damn hardware.
Except that many card schemes are refusing to allow paper charge forms now. In my country, everything's moved to "Offline Authorisation" in case of network failure - the system sees an outage and just approves the transaction and saves it for submission later.
Well, maybe it does make people more likely to donate to Microsoft's Open Source charity, the Codeplex Foundation. But I strongly doubt this is the case.
Of course, there is a bright side if you are dealing with a school or corporate firewall: you can always set up a system at your house that you SSH to, and use as a proxy server. That was something friends of mine used to do in high school.
Or, you know, you could just actually work/study and stop misusing someone else's resources.
If you're running their security software, you've already decided (or the owner of the computer has decided) to allow them to decide whether such sites could be accessed. That's not Microsoft's fault, so what the fuck does your post have to do with anything?
After looking at Nissan.com though, I'd say neither party should get to have the domain. Nissan Motors because they're being douches, and Nissan Computers for having the worst designers ever.
No it isn't. That extension claims to be from Google, but it's not. If it were, it would have a tick before the "from youtube.com" and "G from Google" at the top of the description panel. It doesn't, so the author is fraudulently claiming to be legitimate when it isn't.
Their sample size is still fucking tiny compared to the total number of active sites though, so if a sample size of two is "pulling shit out of your ass" so is a sample size of 3,000,000. And no, you can't disagree with that simply because you like StatCounter's conclusion.
Really, this argument will keep on going until Google announces their conclusion based on Search/Analytics/AdSense figures.
The first think I see is that Intel only releases Linux microcode updates. I assume for Windows, they ask Microsoft to deploy them via Windows Update. Which means 2000 and lower will remain vulnerable unless Microsoft releases an out-of-support update (which they won't).
You'll be able to tell via hardware device IDs (PCI Vendor ID, etc) regardless. Otherwise, it's certain there will be low level calls that allow limited communication with the hypervisor - enough to know it's there (it's how Xen/VMWare/Parallels tools know they're running on a supported VM).
I would for a government agency. Our jobs are the most unstable there are (layoffs once or twice a year), no superannuation plan, no benefits, low salary, and generally it's just shit. I only stay there because I like the team I work with.
Unless of course your preferred TLD is purchased by Amazon, who are buying up TLDs such as ".kids" for the express purpose of ensuring noone other than Amazon may use them. Fuckwads.
For what it's worth, most auctioneers are required to keep records and report them. I don't see why eBay should be treated any differently than a physical auction house in this respect.
Slashdot Mirror
Except that ShadowProtect is ridiculously expensive for small organisations, and the licensing is the biggest pain in the ass on earth (seriously? Dongles?!? Mandatory monthly rental?!?)
Actually, it increases it, since you have to ensure your provider meets the standards and is regularly audited, or you're already in breach.
Until AWS collapses, like it's also done several times before. At which point you're screwed. Forget Amazon, they are years behind using your own damn hardware.
Except that many card schemes are refusing to allow paper charge forms now. In my country, everything's moved to "Offline Authorisation" in case of network failure - the system sees an outage and just approves the transaction and saves it for submission later.
Well, maybe it does make people more likely to donate to Microsoft's Open Source charity, the Codeplex Foundation. But I strongly doubt this is the case.
For average customers no. But if you're an enterprise customer, by dammit you can expect that fix.
Your exhaustive list appears to be missing numerous, more plausible, options. Your bias isn't showing at all.
No-one knows if it's anything to do with Bitcoin. You might want to wait for evidence rather than going on a rampage over an unknown.
There are people crazy enough to punch in their credit card number on a work computer? With the dodgy BlueCoat peering over their shoulder?
Of course, there is a bright side if you are dealing with a school or corporate firewall: you can always set up a system at your house that you SSH to, and use as a proxy server. That was something friends of mine used to do in high school.
Or, you know, you could just actually work/study and stop misusing someone else's resources.
If you're running their security software, you've already decided (or the owner of the computer has decided) to allow them to decide whether such sites could be accessed. That's not Microsoft's fault, so what the fuck does your post have to do with anything?
"Tasteless"? Sounds like it could be Websense.
After looking at Nissan.com though, I'd say neither party should get to have the domain. Nissan Motors because they're being douches, and Nissan Computers for having the worst designers ever.
Applying for a TLD costs almost a quarter of a million dollars. Your theorised situation is implausible at best.
No it isn't. That extension claims to be from Google, but it's not. If it were, it would have a tick before the "from youtube.com" and "G from Google" at the top of the description panel. It doesn't, so the author is fraudulently claiming to be legitimate when it isn't.
Their sample size is still fucking tiny compared to the total number of active sites though, so if a sample size of two is "pulling shit out of your ass" so is a sample size of 3,000,000. And no, you can't disagree with that simply because you like StatCounter's conclusion.
Really, this argument will keep on going until Google announces their conclusion based on Search/Analytics/AdSense figures.
The first think I see is that Intel only releases Linux microcode updates. I assume for Windows, they ask Microsoft to deploy them via Windows Update. Which means 2000 and lower will remain vulnerable unless Microsoft releases an out-of-support update (which they won't).
You'll be able to tell via hardware device IDs (PCI Vendor ID, etc) regardless. Otherwise, it's certain there will be low level calls that allow limited communication with the hypervisor - enough to know it's there (it's how Xen/VMWare/Parallels tools know they're running on a supported VM).
So yes, the guest DOES have to know.
Don't give them ideas. More computers than you think are equipped with TPM and UEFI.
I would for a government agency. Our jobs are the most unstable there are (layoffs once or twice a year), no superannuation plan, no benefits, low salary, and generally it's just shit. I only stay there because I like the team I work with.
Unless of course your preferred TLD is purchased by Amazon, who are buying up TLDs such as ".kids" for the express purpose of ensuring noone other than Amazon may use them. Fuckwads.
Now if you could just link to a credible source, we'd all be very interested I'm sure.
Um, you can. Once you pay the fee you can run anything with your digital signature on your device without any involvement from Apple/MS.
Erm, Austrailian banks didn't get giant government handouts. So I can't see how that's even slightly relevant.
For what it's worth, most auctioneers are required to keep records and report them. I don't see why eBay should be treated any differently than a physical auction house in this respect.