Yeah, that's a general warning (by someone completely unrelated) for people to watch out for insane fuckers like you. Keep up the good work you pathetic old cunt.
Hahahahahaha, you call that payback? Thats some pretty limp whining, APK. You bet I can take it! Especially if all your attacks are as clumsy and ill-aimed as you've managed thus far.
As patiently explained earlier, I've merely responded to a single one of your whines and have used a couple of your other posts as examples. Apparently you're a touch delicate as answering your snivelling questions is enough to traumatise you into accusing me of stalking you. Poor baby, I pity you: life must be a bit tough for you.
Nothing you say here detracts from your own towering hypocrisy. You the stalker, you the wailing sook, you the predictable man-child, you the hypocrite accusing me of both stalking and AC sockpuppeting when I've demonstrably done neither and you continue to engage in both behaviours.
There ya go. I was wondering when you would come around to the conclusion that APK is an eliza-bot. A poorly (or brilliantly) coded one at that.
Yeah, I'm a bit slow on the uptake. I've wondered at my own continuation of the debate with him (it?) and can only conclude it must be some sort of grim fascination on my part. He's something all right.
A fifty year old man behaving like a thirteen year old is quite a sad thing to observe. You demonstrate little more than your immaturity with this post, as whatever it is you accuse me of eventually proves irresistible to you. Before long, you simply cannot avoid showing yourself up as the hypocrite you are.
What do you mean escalate? Things escalate _to_ armed conflict. Once you're there you prepare for the worst.
You might worry about drawing more countries into the fight, but not sending just the right amount of response to a threat like that - the gloves come off at that point and everyone either watches or jumps in.
I reckon there are shades of grey here. The two Gulf conflicts and the fighting in Afghanistan certainly escalated to armed conflict but managed to avoid going nuclear. We all held off on the chemical and biological agents and nobody carpet-bombed cities, detonated EMP weapons to mess up infrastructure, nor any number of things that could have been pursued beyond what we'd consider conventional armed conflict.
I appreciate you weren't necessarily talking about a highly-unbalanced conflict such as the three I mention here, however I'd wager we all know by now that no matter the conflict, the first mushroom cloud that appears - anywhere - represents Game Over for our way of life.
Good point. This idea might work, but we must avoid creating new problems such as the physical addiction you mention. If the legal framework for manufacture of designer drugs required a proven lack of physical addictiveness, it wouldn't help the heroin addicts but it also wouldn't make things any worse for the rest of us. Perhaps this is already a part of the FDA guidelines for new drugs.
Assuming most consumers would seek to purchase drugs legally if they were available, the money they spend would contribute back to the economy rather than flowing into the black market's back pocket. I suspect this is fairly decent chunk of change already being spent, so wouldn't legalisation of drugs be a shot in the arm for the economy?
- manufacturers need workers for production
- retailers need workers for.. er, retail
- sales and consumption taxes flow into the public coffers
- excise tax on the sale of drugs can bolster existing education and rehab programmes
- drug dealers and cartels lose a lot of their power and we might see a drop in firearm violence
- police resources can be focused elsewhere, improving their effectiveness
- prison populations will naturally fall sharply; otherwise-innocent people we pay to incarcerate can re-join the workforce
- average Joe won't be made a criminal for smoking a quiet j at home with his mates
Legalising drugs is no cure-all and will have its own issues. We need to decide for ourselves if these are preferable to the issues we're currently handling.
"Simply observe the general reaction of/. posters to your drivel and you'll see what I mean" - by Sardaukar86 on Thursday January 31, @05:43PM (#42756289) QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3417867&cid=42756289
Well, see your sentiments there, outnumbered by/. posters regarding my posts as NOT being 'drivel' in the link above - you FAIL, as always & to the tune of nearly 250:1 against you!
And, there you go - rotlflmao!
... apk
Why are you having so much trouble with this simple concept, APK? You're not even bothering to comprehend the argument I just made, you are only capable of kindergarten-level squealing without a shred of rational thought.
So, counter my point: you have far more down-mods than you do up-mods. Thus, your list proves only your insanity, not your popularity.
In response in the link above, I merely easily replied WITH EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY, when I posted nearly 250 contrary opinions of your/. peers in my upward moderations from them, easily, to THAT rubbish from YOU, quoted above!
No, you didn't. Your 'evidence' proves nothing, retard, that's the whole point that you're wilfully missing.
Your post history shows you're projecting since you stalk him endlessly and obsessively.
Your madness shows itself by forcing you to pretend to be someone unrelated, solely to post remarks in support of your own non-argument, APK.
BTW if you weren't so self-deluded you wouldn't need to tell lies about me 'stalking endlessly and obsessively'; I have responded to precisely one question you asked in a public forum and I have referred you to one or two places to illuminate to you that a) I understand your strategy and it stinks of fail and b) you are demonstrating my point for me as your other poorly-received postings get the down-moderation they deserve.
If you are going to post pathetic, whinging, immature rants phrased as questions against your perceived ill-treatment, do expect to get called on it and don't cry like a little bitch when it happens.
Well, of course you'd call me the same thing. It's the meat of your argument: "I know you are, I said you are, but what am I?" Some big guns you've got there buddy!
It's often said that "repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results" is a symptom of insanity
Definitely. They were thinking of behaviour like yours when they said that.
..so is LIBELING others, which is ILLEGAL!
(Which you've done shown repeatedly in the link above, showing you DO NOT CONSIDER THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACTIONS either (especially illegal ones like libel)
Oooooh, goody! Is this the bit where you threaten me with lawyers? I especially enjoyed when you got some sand in your vagina, puffed yourself up to the full extent of your pomposity and did just that here. Look at that APK, you behave like enough of a prick for someone to make a page to warn others about people like you!
I especially enjoyed the summary later where, as expected, you wriggled away with your pride in tatters and your tail between your legs:
Thor Schrock said on June 10th, 2008 at 8:56 am
Case and point. No lawsuits, no communications from lawyers, and the eventual 'I wasn’t really going to sue you'.
You later came back with:
That’s right, you keep your mouth shut alright: You have NOTHING to say, & no backup vs. my questions here – some “computer expert” you are Thor lol!
Yeah, APK - you're a real class act.
P.S.=> Sardaukar86, when you get your PhD in the psychiatric sciences, a license to practice in them, and most importantly a FORMAL EXAMINATION of my "alleged mental state" given in a licensed professional psychiatric environs? Get back to us... it won't be libel then (why do you think courts of law bring in shrinks to court in matters of insanity pleas? They're the ONLY folks that can do that, & literally have certificates proving they're 'sane')...
APK, if you were under court order to undergo such an examination and were found to be mentally ill, it is obvious that you wouldn't believe the doctor anyway. You're just too arrogant.
Your only counter is to post your list of 244 up-mods in a disingenuous attempt to frame this as the full story. ("No, see, 244 people modded me up, so you are wrong")
It is not the full story, APK, and I believe you know it is not, for these reasons:
1. 244 people did not mod you up. Your list shows up-moderation instances, not unique moderators. You are wilfully distorting the truth by omitting this information.
2. Claiming "No, see, 244 people modded me up, so you are wrong" is also disingenuous, because you are failing to account for the vast majority of your posts that were down-modded. You are therefore passing yourself off as something you are not, every time you pull out that list. Once again you are wilfully distorting the truth by omitting this information.
3. You fail to respond to arguments that seek to address these discrepancies. Your only counter is to scream obscenities in bold, caps and WaReZ (it's been a while since I saw that in the wild) and post your list again. You are wilfully avoiding the matter because you know you are telling lies.
Well, see your sentiments there, outnumbered by/. posters regarding my posts as NOT being 'drivel' in the link above - you FAIL, as always & to the tune of nearly 250:1 against you!
And, there you go - rotlflmao!
... apk
No, you missed it again APK. I'd like to counter your last tirade by taking a moment to explore your 'logic'. Let's make up a little scenario: say you have infinite time and over the course of a number of years, you make three hundred thousand/. posts. Let's also assume, for the sake of the example, that nearly every one of these posts earns itself a -1 down-modding by members of the community.
I put it to you that your only counter is to post your list of 244 up-mods in a disingenuous attempt to frame this as the full story. ("No, see, 244 people modded me up, so you are wrong")
It is not the full story, APK, and I believe you know it is not, for these reasons:
1. 244 people did not mod you up. Your list shows up-moderation instances, not unique moderators. You are wilfully distorting the truth by omitting this information.
2. Claiming "No, see, 244 people modded me up, so you are wrong" is also disingenuous, because you are failing to account for the other 299,756 posts that were down-modded. You are therefore passing yourself off as something you are not, every time you pull out that list. Once again you are wilfully distorting the truth by omitting this information.
3. You fail to respond to arguments that seek to address these discrepancies. Your only counter is to scream obscenities in bold, caps and WaReZ (it's been a while since I saw that in the wild) and post your list again. You are wilfully avoiding the matter because you know you are telling lies.
I don't imagine you see how this applies to your current behaviour, however I can assure you that it most certainly does. Your list proves nothing other than APK is a liar, because the entire list is a lie by omission intended to distort the truth and paint a false picture of the value of your contributions. You are a liar and a fake and a very sore loser. You lost when you first trotted that list out and you've done nothing but squirm and wriggle to avoid facing it in every post to me since.
Childish claims of 'dusting me' etc. are just a smokescreen to avoid answering the question.
you said others here are "so bright" well... if they KNEW about logon scripts as you said earlier, why didn't THEY state it?
I'm feeling charitable, I'll help: probably because you are a bore and most people skip over your comments.
Contrary to your pompous, arrogant opinion on the matter, this is not evidence that you are the only knowledgeable person here. Your simplistic reasoning skills have left you high and dry again. I don't suffer from your flavour of mental illness, which is a shame really because I could then maintain a list of your down-moderation incidents throughout your posting history and post them to you in long lists as answer to any question you posed me.
However, I fully expect you to consider this as cast-iron evidence for your own high level of popularity on this board. You are deluding yourself; your defence is toilet tissue.
Even if every Slashdotter posted in unison to this effect you still wouldn't believe them. In fact, I could very easily see you trying to counter by sending your lists of 'evidence' to each an every one of them; you're just that nutty.
Slashdot Mirror
APK, you cocksucking motherfucking loser, are you the most pathetic crybaby on the face of the earth?
You just might be: I think so.
Yeah, that's a general warning (by someone completely unrelated) for people to watch out for insane fuckers like you. Keep up the good work you pathetic old cunt.
Horseshit.
If this was real you wouldn't be posting about it on Slashdot, you lying cunt.
Hahahahahaha, you call that payback? Thats some pretty limp whining, APK. You bet I can take it! Especially if all your attacks are as clumsy and ill-aimed as you've managed thus far.
As patiently explained earlier, I've merely responded to a single one of your whines and have used a couple of your other posts as examples. Apparently you're a touch delicate as answering your snivelling questions is enough to traumatise you into accusing me of stalking you. Poor baby, I pity you: life must be a bit tough for you.
Nothing you say here detracts from your own towering hypocrisy. You the stalker, you the wailing sook, you the predictable man-child, you the hypocrite accusing me of both stalking and AC sockpuppeting when I've demonstrably done neither and you continue to engage in both behaviours.
There ya go. I was wondering when you would come around to the conclusion that APK is an eliza-bot. A poorly (or brilliantly) coded one at that.
Yeah, I'm a bit slow on the uptake. I've wondered at my own continuation of the debate with him (it?) and can only conclude it must be some sort of grim fascination on my part. He's something all right.
1. Lies on your part help my case, not yours.
2. They are some of our fellow Slashdotters. The rest clearly think you are a tedious, childish bore, judging by many of the replies you receive.
Stop telling lies, APK. You know very well those aren't 250 people on your list.
Resorting to obvious lies to back your argument should be enough of a hint that you have no argument.
Hahahaha Sardaukar86 has to "eat his words" -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3417867&cid=42756893
You are the most feeble 'opponent' I think I've ever had; nobody else would walk themselves into world-class hypocrisy for all to see: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3427061&cid=42771179
Keep up the good work APK!
Your behaviour is rather predictable. Observe:
"I'd call it since you stalk me.. lol! apk" (from http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3417867&cid=42744373)
A fifty year old man behaving like a thirteen year old is quite a sad thing to observe. You demonstrate little more than your immaturity with this post, as whatever it is you accuse me of eventually proves irresistible to you. Before long, you simply cannot avoid showing yourself up as the hypocrite you are.
and the love projectile takes out Denver.
That's not a missile, it's a token of North Korean affection.
Hug me with nuclear arms, baby!
What do you mean escalate? Things escalate _to_ armed conflict. Once you're there you prepare for the worst. You might worry about drawing more countries into the fight, but not sending just the right amount of response to a threat like that - the gloves come off at that point and everyone either watches or jumps in.
I reckon there are shades of grey here. The two Gulf conflicts and the fighting in Afghanistan certainly escalated to armed conflict but managed to avoid going nuclear. We all held off on the chemical and biological agents and nobody carpet-bombed cities, detonated EMP weapons to mess up infrastructure, nor any number of things that could have been pursued beyond what we'd consider conventional armed conflict.
I appreciate you weren't necessarily talking about a highly-unbalanced conflict such as the three I mention here, however I'd wager we all know by now that no matter the conflict, the first mushroom cloud that appears - anywhere - represents Game Over for our way of life.
Good point. This idea might work, but we must avoid creating new problems such as the physical addiction you mention.
If the legal framework for manufacture of designer drugs required a proven lack of physical addictiveness, it wouldn't help the heroin addicts but it also wouldn't make things any worse for the rest of us. Perhaps this is already a part of the FDA guidelines for new drugs.
Assuming most consumers would seek to purchase drugs legally if they were available, the money they spend would contribute back to the economy rather than flowing into the black market's back pocket. I suspect this is fairly decent chunk of change already being spent, so wouldn't legalisation of drugs be a shot in the arm for the economy?
Legalising drugs is no cure-all and will have its own issues. We need to decide for ourselves if these are preferable to the issues we're currently handling.
If this repetitive shit is the best you can do, you've proven yourself too stupid to engage in a rational discussion.
"Simply observe the general reaction of /. posters to your drivel and you'll see what I mean" - by Sardaukar86 on Thursday January 31, @05:43PM (#42756289) QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3417867&cid=42756289
Well, see your sentiments there, outnumbered by /. posters regarding my posts as NOT being 'drivel' in the link above - you FAIL, as always & to the tune of nearly 250:1 against you!
And, there you go - rotlflmao!
... apk
Why are you having so much trouble with this simple concept, APK? You're not even bothering to comprehend the argument I just made, you are only capable of kindergarten-level squealing without a shred of rational thought.
So, counter my point: you have far more down-mods than you do up-mods. Thus, your list proves only your insanity, not your popularity.
Posting your list again proves my point, not yours my mentally-incompetent friend.
What was all that about?
Ah, of course, more smokescreen to prevent you from actually tackling the points I make, idiot.
Post your same non-arguments again - you're a retarded robot with the personality and reasoning skills of an escapee mental patient.
In response in the link above, I merely easily replied WITH EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY, when I posted nearly 250 contrary opinions of your /. peers in my upward moderations from them, easily, to THAT rubbish from YOU, quoted above!
No, you didn't. Your 'evidence' proves nothing, retard, that's the whole point that you're wilfully missing.
Oh, I almost forgot to call you out on posting AC in a shallow pretence of support for your post. Again.
Grow up, you pathetic old fool.
Your post history shows you're projecting since you stalk him endlessly and obsessively.
Your madness shows itself by forcing you to pretend to be someone unrelated, solely to post remarks in support of your own non-argument, APK.
BTW if you weren't so self-deluded you wouldn't need to tell lies about me 'stalking endlessly and obsessively'; I have responded to precisely one question you asked in a public forum and I have referred you to one or two places to illuminate to you that a) I understand your strategy and it stinks of fail and b) you are demonstrating my point for me as your other poorly-received postings get the down-moderation they deserve.
If you are going to post pathetic, whinging, immature rants phrased as questions against your perceived ill-treatment, do expect to get called on it and don't cry like a little bitch when it happens.
Well, of course you'd call me the same thing. It's the meat of your argument: "I know you are, I said you are, but what am I?"
Some big guns you've got there buddy!
It's often said that "repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results" is a symptom of insanity
Definitely. They were thinking of behaviour like yours when they said that.
..so is LIBELING others, which is ILLEGAL!
(Which you've done shown repeatedly in the link above, showing you DO NOT CONSIDER THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACTIONS either (especially illegal ones like libel)
Oooooh, goody! Is this the bit where you threaten me with lawyers? I especially enjoyed when you got some sand in your vagina, puffed yourself up to the full extent of your pomposity and did just that here. Look at that APK, you behave like enough of a prick for someone to make a page to warn others about people like you!
I especially enjoyed the summary later where, as expected, you wriggled away with your pride in tatters and your tail between your legs:
Thor Schrock said on June 10th, 2008 at 8:56 am
Case and point. No lawsuits, no communications from lawyers, and the eventual 'I wasn’t really going to sue you'.
You later came back with:
That’s right, you keep your mouth shut alright: You have NOTHING to say, & no backup vs. my questions here – some “computer expert” you are Thor lol!
Yeah, APK - you're a real class act.
P.S.=> Sardaukar86, when you get your PhD in the psychiatric sciences, a license to practice in them, and most importantly a FORMAL EXAMINATION of my "alleged mental state" given in a licensed professional psychiatric environs? Get back to us... it won't be libel then (why do you think courts of law bring in shrinks to court in matters of insanity pleas? They're the ONLY folks that can do that, & literally have certificates proving they're 'sane')...
APK, if you were under court order to undergo such an examination and were found to be mentally ill, it is obvious that you wouldn't believe the doctor anyway. You're just too arrogant.
If your contributions are so valuable, why is this most informative post of yours still modded as Troll?
Why hasn't it managed to do anything more than languish at the bottom? Maybe the bottom is where it belongs?
Poor APK, I'm sure the gang here at /. just has you all wrong.
You just proved the point of my other post:
Your only counter is to post your list of 244 up-mods in a disingenuous attempt to frame this as the full story. ("No, see, 244 people modded me up, so you are wrong")
It is not the full story, APK, and I believe you know it is not, for these reasons:
1. 244 people did not mod you up. Your list shows up-moderation instances, not unique moderators. You are wilfully distorting the truth by omitting this information.
2. Claiming "No, see, 244 people modded me up, so you are wrong" is also disingenuous, because you are failing to account for the vast majority of your posts that were down-modded. You are therefore passing yourself off as something you are not, every time you pull out that list. Once again you are wilfully distorting the truth by omitting this information.
3. You fail to respond to arguments that seek to address these discrepancies. Your only counter is to scream obscenities in bold, caps and WaReZ (it's been a while since I saw that in the wild) and post your list again. You are wilfully avoiding the matter because you know you are telling lies.
Hey look APK! I missed closing the (ul) tag in my last post!
Guess that means you win the argument, huh?
Well, see your sentiments there, outnumbered by /. posters regarding my posts as NOT being 'drivel' in the link above - you FAIL, as always & to the tune of nearly 250:1 against you!
And, there you go - rotlflmao!
... apk
No, you missed it again APK. I'd like to counter your last tirade by taking a moment to explore your 'logic'. /. posts. Let's also assume, for the sake of the example, that nearly every one of these posts earns itself a -1 down-modding by members of the community.
Let's make up a little scenario: say you have infinite time and over the course of a number of years, you make three hundred thousand
I put it to you that your only counter is to post your list of 244 up-mods in a disingenuous attempt to frame this as the full story. ("No, see, 244 people modded me up, so you are wrong")
It is not the full story, APK, and I believe you know it is not, for these reasons:
I don't imagine you see how this applies to your current behaviour, however I can assure you that it most certainly does. Your list proves nothing other than APK is a liar, because the entire list is a lie by omission intended to distort the truth and paint a false picture of the value of your contributions. You are a liar and a fake and a very sore loser. You lost when you first trotted that list out and you've done nothing but squirm and wriggle to avoid facing it in every post to me since.
Childish claims of 'dusting me' etc. are just a smokescreen to avoid answering the question.
you said others here are "so bright" well... if they KNEW about logon scripts as you said earlier, why didn't THEY state it?
I'm feeling charitable, I'll help: probably because you are a bore and most people skip over your comments.
Contrary to your pompous, arrogant opinion on the matter, this is not evidence that you are the only knowledgeable person here. Your simplistic reasoning skills have left you high and dry again. I don't suffer from your flavour of mental illness, which is a shame really because I could then maintain a list of your down-moderation incidents throughout your posting history and post them to you in long lists as answer to any question you posed me.
However, I fully expect you to consider this as cast-iron evidence for your own high level of popularity on this board. You are deluding yourself; your defence is toilet tissue.
Even if every Slashdotter posted in unison to this effect you still wouldn't believe them. In fact, I could very easily see you trying to counter by sending your lists of 'evidence' to each an every one of them; you're just that nutty.