I really like the combination of complete insensitivity for the people who got hurt combined with the outrage that "regular people pay higher prices". It must be nice to be able to sit on your moral high ground and look down upon the sinners who had the audacity to get injured.
Y'know, if we had any sort of decent health care in this country, we would not need lawyers to help innocent people recover the costs of health care that big evil careless corporations imposed on them.
Unfortunately, our society needs a specialty in the private sector that helps injured people recover. If technology can help drive down the incidental costs of litigation (like advertising, taking depositions, etc), that is a good thing. I just wonder whether the original poster's idea actually streamlines that process and drives down the costs, or whether he's making the whole process more cumbersome.
I've often wondered about what I think of as the Googleberg uncertainty priniple.
Because google lists the top ten sites as the top ten, then most people only look at those top ten sites, which are then linked to the most often.
The very act of pointing out which sites are linked the most often... changes the very system and... oh, now my head is spinning again.
Slashdot Mirror
I really like the combination of complete insensitivity for the people who got hurt combined with the outrage that "regular people pay higher prices". It must be nice to be able to sit on your moral high ground and look down upon the sinners who had the audacity to get injured. Y'know, if we had any sort of decent health care in this country, we would not need lawyers to help innocent people recover the costs of health care that big evil careless corporations imposed on them. Unfortunately, our society needs a specialty in the private sector that helps injured people recover. If technology can help drive down the incidental costs of litigation (like advertising, taking depositions, etc), that is a good thing. I just wonder whether the original poster's idea actually streamlines that process and drives down the costs, or whether he's making the whole process more cumbersome.
I've often wondered about what I think of as the Googleberg uncertainty priniple. Because google lists the top ten sites as the top ten, then most people only look at those top ten sites, which are then linked to the most often. The very act of pointing out which sites are linked the most often ... changes the very system and ... oh, now my head is spinning again.