"The difference is substantial--C++ is driven by a philosophy of efficiency and compatibility"
The difference is that C++ is driven by buzzword whores and 2 bit hacks who had to work 15 years to have any sort of compatibility. And Objective-C is just as efficient as C++. In fact, studies show that Objective-C programs have an incredibly lower footprint that your precious c++. And your entire systems level argument is complete crap. Darwin has objective-c frameworks for "systems-level" interaction.
UPDATE: Registerfly finally renewed my domain when they credited my account for charges (unlike before). whois confirms it.
This of course does nothing for those of us who will expire out of the grace period before 15 days.
Except a native one.
"The difference is substantial--C++ is driven by a philosophy of efficiency and compatibility" The difference is that C++ is driven by buzzword whores and 2 bit hacks who had to work 15 years to have any sort of compatibility. And Objective-C is just as efficient as C++. In fact, studies show that Objective-C programs have an incredibly lower footprint that your precious c++. And your entire systems level argument is complete crap. Darwin has objective-c frameworks for "systems-level" interaction.
Can't wait till sarge squashes ubuntu like the leach it is.
Looks like one more PITA for porters...
How about just not making it at all. FF obviously has replaced anything of value in IE.
I supose we're going to have to wait till 9 for Acid2.