Who is Rush?
No, but ANTHROPOGENIC global warming is a farce.
Let's review:
The number one influence of climate is the sun - and we've just passed one of the most active periods of sun activity in recorded history.... and let's be clear - solar sunspot measurement is the longest, most accurate science study in our history - over 500 years long since Galileo. Our current weather influence has a 90% correlation to sunspot activity - whereas the IPCC idiocy (which is based on a math error) only has a 40% correlation. But of course, you chose the lower correlation.... (roll eyes)
But since econuts can't do a thing about the sun, they ignore it and blame us humans.
The second (a far second) is water vapor - but since econuts can't possibly debate oceans, they igonre this too (and blame humans)
A far, far, far, distance third is CO2 - HURRAH! Econuts claim humans influence this!! But the complete total of human CO2 (includes every possible human activity from breathing to farming and herding cows) doesn't even equal THE ANNUAL VARIANCE OF NATURAL SOURCES!! In other words, our output is lost in merely the CHANGE of natural source! We couldn't tell if our CO2 causes anything since we can't separate our exhaust from the mere increase or decrease of CO2 in nature (and by the way, for the ignorant, that means the actual PRODUCE of natural sources is, well, 12 times greater then the greatest amount humans could possible create)!! It's spitting in the ocean and claiming we are causing tidal waves!
So, which insanity are you buying from the econuts?
As a participant in an experiment to seed thunderclouds to prevent hail, I see this "threat" of Human-caused Global Warming as a farce.
Over a 5 year period, the attempt to seed these thunderclouds to reduce hail had absolutely no statistical effect. That is, the clouds rained or hailed with the same frequencey as non-seeded clouds.
If after 5 years and millions of dollars of direct and focused attempt at climate change in a such a small, localized, and compared to global weather, and insignificant system was a sum total of.... NOTHING....... how can people be so arrogant to assume that humans can cause a global, massive, and most significant changes BY ACCIDENT?!??!
We can't change a single microcosm of weather when we want to...but we can change the entire weather of the globe by accident....(ya, right!)
The insanity of econuts is boundless....:D
Slashdot Mirror
Who is Rush? No, but ANTHROPOGENIC global warming is a farce. Let's review: The number one influence of climate is the sun - and we've just passed one of the most active periods of sun activity in recorded history .... and let's be clear - solar sunspot measurement is the longest, most accurate science study in our history - over 500 years long since Galileo. Our current weather influence has a 90% correlation to sunspot activity - whereas the IPCC idiocy (which is based on a math error) only has a 40% correlation. But of course, you chose the lower correlation .... (roll eyes)
But since econuts can't do a thing about the sun, they ignore it and blame us humans.
The second (a far second) is water vapor - but since econuts can't possibly debate oceans, they igonre this too (and blame humans)
A far, far, far, distance third is CO2 - HURRAH! Econuts claim humans influence this!! But the complete total of human CO2 (includes every possible human activity from breathing to farming and herding cows) doesn't even equal THE ANNUAL VARIANCE OF NATURAL SOURCES!! In other words, our output is lost in merely the CHANGE of natural source! We couldn't tell if our CO2 causes anything since we can't separate our exhaust from the mere increase or decrease of CO2 in nature (and by the way, for the ignorant, that means the actual PRODUCE of natural sources is, well, 12 times greater then the greatest amount humans could possible create)!! It's spitting in the ocean and claiming we are causing tidal waves!
So, which insanity are you buying from the econuts?
As a participant in an experiment to seed thunderclouds to prevent hail, I see this "threat" of Human-caused Global Warming as a farce. Over a 5 year period, the attempt to seed these thunderclouds to reduce hail had absolutely no statistical effect. That is, the clouds rained or hailed with the same frequencey as non-seeded clouds. If after 5 years and millions of dollars of direct and focused attempt at climate change in a such a small, localized, and compared to global weather, and insignificant system was a sum total of .... NOTHING... .... how can people be so arrogant to assume that humans can cause a global, massive, and most significant changes BY ACCIDENT?!??!
We can't change a single microcosm of weather when we want to...but we can change the entire weather of the globe by accident....(ya, right!)
The insanity of econuts is boundless.... :D