The Judge has ordered that since, even though there is no logging, the IPs are available in the RAM for a period of time, that constitutes a recording and they were ordered to capture that information from the RAM in a more permanent spot. I don't understand something. If this is correct, it sounds like the judge is asking for TorrentSpy to go back in time and give him the data log, since it could have been done (and obviously is too late to do now). Or, that TorrentSpy is in the wrong for not collecting the data in the first place? Someone please help me out!
He's lived all his life in a train station. Ever see one of the Grand Central Station boards flip ALL the way through the destinations before resetting itself back to nothing? I used to think that was so cool...
-Matt
I always thought that capacitors could deliver a decent sizeable amount of energy, but that the problem was more that it would want to do so quickly. Wouldn't that mean that if 500 miles per top-off was even correct, that those 500 miles would have to be driven immediately (e.g., no topping off the night before a long drive)?
Slashdot Mirror
He's lived all his life in a train station. Ever see one of the Grand Central Station boards flip ALL the way through the destinations before resetting itself back to nothing? I used to think that was so cool... -Matt
Can this technology be used to display the SAME image on all three sides, to greatly enhance the viewing angle? -Matt
I always thought that capacitors could deliver a decent sizeable amount of energy, but that the problem was more that it would want to do so quickly. Wouldn't that mean that if 500 miles per top-off was even correct, that those 500 miles would have to be driven immediately (e.g., no topping off the night before a long drive)?
I just saw a commerical for those gimmick-y space bags. Anybody ever try them? Do they work? -Matt