Has anyone actually read the article? The writer and the scientist came to the conclusion that evolution was right and creation wrong without actually proving anything. The article itself cites that the researcher needs to look into what the hell happened. Creation and Evolution aside, lets actually PROVE SOMETHING before we go off on a 600+ post tangent. This article hits home to a lot of people and shows the slanted opinion of the slashdot staff. Lets actually get some solid evidence before we go out telling everybody creation is a hoax because we cannot explain a mutation in a strain of E Coli. If we are going to be scientific... lets actually be scientific.
-The Voice of Wisdom and Prudence
Slashdot Mirror
Has anyone actually read the article? The writer and the scientist came to the conclusion that evolution was right and creation wrong without actually proving anything. The article itself cites that the researcher needs to look into what the hell happened. Creation and Evolution aside, lets actually PROVE SOMETHING before we go off on a 600+ post tangent. This article hits home to a lot of people and shows the slanted opinion of the slashdot staff. Lets actually get some solid evidence before we go out telling everybody creation is a hoax because we cannot explain a mutation in a strain of E Coli. If we are going to be scientific... lets actually be scientific. -The Voice of Wisdom and Prudence