Research the reasons for the catastrophic failures, if certain design and managerial blunders had not been made, all the crews and all the shuttles all would have returned safely. My math is fine, all those failed shuttles were designed for more successful missions than they had.
so those QCD calculations tell you if the Higgs exists and if it is composed of two tops? My former employer sure is spending a lot of time and money on Top experiments, must be a wee bit those numeric methods can't do....
No, in the 70s we had a model which might or might not have given useful physical results. Now we discover a neutral combination of strange, up and bottom quarks that further prove the model is useful (an ongoing endeavor for decades).
this is a big deal, a fundamental discovery in physics that further validates a model that needs continued validation, not a mere "engineering accomplishment".
Specific Impulse is more important than energy density. Lithium/Flourine/Hydrogen liquid propellant is the best. No worries, once off earth better to burn "longer" than "harder" and we have other technologies with higher specific impulse, 8 to 25x that of liquid chemical
My safety threshold isn't high at all, we're talking about 40% failure rate the way I count, five shuttles used for launches, two kill their crew. Would any model of airplane with those statistics be used to fly, regardless of number of flights?
Yes, they put the ball in motion, but I was specifically referring to the January 1, 1979 recognition of the People's Republic as the sole government of China and reestablishment of normal diplomatic relations, and the breaking of relations with Taiwan.
Indians are better programmers
No, they are mostly forced to being uncreative mindless drones because of culture and "the system" over there. The ones who can get out of that mindset, usually by going to foreign land and getting fired up about being self-empowered and innovative , now that's another matter.
as opposed to subjected it to the bust of a beyond bankrupt government. The social security monies really were looted and replaced with IOUs; many shills for the system are trying to portray it otherwise.
Not really, this is a device for a one-off reactor design. Removing the fuel rods from a normal reactor isn't a big deal. Still, the costs of decommissioning a reactor in the U.S. is estimated at over $300M
and what's with that "architecture" crack? It runs on more architectures than most Linux multi-arch distros. For example, comparing it with Debian, it doesn't run on the S/390 or Itanium but all the others, but also supports four more Debian doesn't have.
A dampening system can be added, which might take the form of a weight attached by springs. The dampener lowers the amplitude of oscillations, and also happens to lower the resonant
It is funny that there was nothing in -current serious enough to be a security/errata patch yet with 4.9; with most releases there would be a few by now. Maybe it'll be known as the "golden release" if that turns out to be true for another couple months.
What an ignorant set up statements, the application set is huge (over 6000 binary packages for amd/intel) and includes all the common apps for desktop, languages, web.
The users number in the thousands at least, and moreover, unless your a windoze weenie, you are likely typing your troll into a machine with code on it from the OpenBSD team.
for the last couple years, http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware
very good, works with all the wireless and USB devices I've plugged into it including cameras, several types of wireless ethernet, usb to serial. Yes, it works on my Toshiba and Thinkpad laptops with all video and sound ok, admittedly as one of two alternate partitions for grand occassions with windows xp, and not my main Linux one.; A lot of the recent device additions of that is due to NetBSD and FreeBSD, the BSD license is great for spreading the device love around.
Slashdot Mirror
Research the reasons for the catastrophic failures, if certain design and managerial blunders had not been made, all the crews and all the shuttles all would have returned safely. My math is fine, all those failed shuttles were designed for more successful missions than they had.
so those QCD calculations tell you if the Higgs exists and if it is composed of two tops? My former employer sure is spending a lot of time and money on Top experiments, must be a wee bit those numeric methods can't do....
No, in the 70s we had a model which might or might not have given useful physical results. Now we discover a neutral combination of strange, up and bottom quarks that further prove the model is useful (an ongoing endeavor for decades). this is a big deal, a fundamental discovery in physics that further validates a model that needs continued validation, not a mere "engineering accomplishment".
Specific Impulse is more important than energy density. Lithium/Flourine/Hydrogen liquid propellant is the best. No worries, once off earth better to burn "longer" than "harder" and we have other technologies with higher specific impulse, 8 to 25x that of liquid chemical
My safety threshold isn't high at all, we're talking about 40% failure rate the way I count, five shuttles used for launches, two kill their crew. Would any model of airplane with those statistics be used to fly, regardless of number of flights?
I'm an engineer who can reason and point out truths that make wimpier people uncomfortable. 2/5 of all shuttles launched have killed people.
There are not 135 shuttles. two out of five that went into space have killed their crew.
Yes, they put the ball in motion, but I was specifically referring to the January 1, 1979 recognition of the People's Republic as the sole government of China and reestablishment of normal diplomatic relations, and the breaking of relations with Taiwan.
with unreliable history of that death trap, might be the last shuttle to burn up, the last crew to die
looks like an icy grey egg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haumea_(dwarf_planet)
That was jimmy carter-o-nomics that snubbed taiwan to open trade with China.
they are IOUs, and that is what will crash in value on the world market if we default on national debt payments.
I always look for the Inter Inside sticker
Indians are better programmers
No, they are mostly forced to being uncreative mindless drones because of culture and "the system" over there. The ones who can get out of that mindset, usually by going to foreign land and getting fired up about being self-empowered and innovative , now that's another matter.
as opposed to subjected it to the bust of a beyond bankrupt government. The social security monies really were looted and replaced with IOUs; many shills for the system are trying to portray it otherwise.
Not really, this is a device for a one-off reactor design. Removing the fuel rods from a normal reactor isn't a big deal. Still, the costs of decommissioning a reactor in the U.S. is estimated at over $300M
and what's with that "architecture" crack? It runs on more architectures than most Linux multi-arch distros. For example, comparing it with Debian, it doesn't run on the S/390 or Itanium but all the others, but also supports four more Debian doesn't have.
I knew their acting couldn't bring down the house.
heh, meant to write "a damper lowers".......they don't use wet washcloths 8D
A dampening system can be added, which might take the form of a weight attached by springs. The dampener lowers the amplitude of oscillations, and also happens to lower the resonant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuned_mass_damper
It is funny that there was nothing in -current serious enough to be a security/errata patch yet with 4.9; with most releases there would be a few by now. Maybe it'll be known as the "golden release" if that turns out to be true for another couple months.
What an ignorant set up statements, the application set is huge (over 6000 binary packages for amd/intel) and includes all the common apps for desktop, languages, web.
The users number in the thousands at least, and moreover, unless your a windoze weenie, you are likely typing your troll into a machine with code on it from the OpenBSD team.
for the last couple years, http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware very good, works with all the wireless and USB devices I've plugged into it including cameras, several types of wireless ethernet, usb to serial. Yes, it works on my Toshiba and Thinkpad laptops with all video and sound ok, admittedly as one of two alternate partitions for grand occassions with windows xp, and not my main Linux one.; A lot of the recent device additions of that is due to NetBSD and FreeBSD, the BSD license is great for spreading the device love around.
my Ubuntu goes all the way to 11!
p.s. (then it jumped the shark)
abort gay whales for jesus!