Slashdot Mirror


User: CarpetShark

CarpetShark's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,032
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,032

  1. Re:Taking out capital ships? on New Russian Weapon Hides In Shipping Container · · Score: 1

    Surely then the defense is to ensure your ships cook is Steven Seagal?

    Yep. I prefer the other solution though: cut the movie budget. That way, Erika would turn into some old hag who does movies for less, the Navy would see her from a distance, be horrified, and blow the helicopter out of the sky.

  2. Re:Taking out capital ships? on New Russian Weapon Hides In Shipping Container · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't believe it's possible to get anything bigger than a football close enough to a cruiser,

    The trick is to pretend to be a rock band, and have Erika Eleniak in tow.

  3. Re:Air-Typing? No thanks on Project-Natal-Style Interface For Mobile Phones · · Score: 1

    I want a mobile with a laser projected keyboard, and a light-protected screen. With the normal screen and touchscreen keyboard as a backup when there are no good surfaces around, of course. Seems the most obvious (and cool) way to get the necessarily large IO devices "into" a small form factor.

    I haven't actually tried a laser keyboard though. Anyone know if they're actually usable for serious work?

  4. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    I think you failed to read my whole post. There was nothing religiously peaceful about it; simply a few remarks on various attitudes to invasion and how that's played out historically.

  5. Re:Doesn't sound so bad on Mass. Data Security Law Says "Thou Shalt Encrypt" · · Score: 1

    "it stores the encryption key on the disk so that it can be decrypted...all the data will be visible. The investigator can then image the suspect drive."

  6. Re:Doesn't sound so bad on Mass. Data Security Law Says "Thou Shalt Encrypt" · · Score: 1

    you can no longer keep an email in unencrypted form.

    Hey. on the other hand - maybe this will help kill off facebook.

    I think you're confusing forms with farms.

  7. Re:Doesn't sound so bad on Mass. Data Security Law Says "Thou Shalt Encrypt" · · Score: 1

    a) http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bitlocker+vulnerabilities Wasn't so hard, was it? ;)
    b) http://www.macforensicslab.com/ProductsAndServices/index.php?main_page=document_general_info&products_id=260 The official (secret, not for publication) microsoft training documents for forensics teams can be found online if you know where to look too.

  8. Re:Phone book on Mass. Data Security Law Says "Thou Shalt Encrypt" · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's a lot more benign and short-reaching than the summary makes out. Surprising, huh? ;)

  9. Re:His Master's Voice on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    I would like to know what possible resource we might have on the Earth that can't be found much, much more abundantly and in a form much easier to obtain elsewhere

    Human skulls my friend. Human skulls.

  10. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    If they have spaceships, then they can go out to the asteriod belt and hurl an endless supply of ammunition at us that would decimate us and pose no risk at all to the attackers.

    Maybe they like risk. They did jump on a rocket going between stars, after all. They might just be vicious bastards who like to see us splatter up close.

  11. Re:Doesn't sound so bad on Mass. Data Security Law Says "Thou Shalt Encrypt" · · Score: 1

    You know, all of the use cases you describe can be supported by ticking the 'encrypt' checkbox that Windows NT has had since version 4

    Except that:

    a) Windows encryption is known to be flawed, and using a known-bad encrpytion system for this sort of thing probably counts as negligence.
    b) Windows encrpytion has back doors, and... see above.
    c) Anyone implementing encrpytion at the flick of a switch without properly planning for it will very likely regret it when it comes to file recovery, backup use, etc.

  12. Re:For what application? on EComStation 2.0 GA To Be Released May 14 · · Score: 1

    Ahh, looking back, I must have skipped the view at DNA because it said "view enhanced.." My internal spam filter expected that to be a premium download link, as popularised by other sites like rapidshare.

  13. Re:For what application? on EComStation 2.0 GA To Be Released May 14 · · Score: 1

    Oh, good. I normally skip streaming for downloads, so while I was aware that you had some streaming links, I figured they were only for the trailers, since I'd seen later that the trailers were more prominent and the downloads seemed to all be hosted on mirror sites. Admittedly, I scanned a lot and didn't look too hard.

  14. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    p.s.: thanks for the story tip; sounds interesting.

  15. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    my unevolved brain can dream up some pretty scary weapons

    True, but you know... a tomahawk is a pretty scary weapon. To a sword fighter or a buffalo, an archery bow is a scary weapon, able to kill from a distance, quite silently. To more advanced invaders though, the scariness doesn't matter much, since they're largely ineffective.

  16. Re:Translation on Russian Hacker Selling 1.5M Facebook Accounts · · Score: 1

    There are banks that allow you to log in with the same username/password auth system that sites like facebook use? If so, you should probably expect it to have been hacked ages ago.

  17. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hiding will never work :)

    OMG, who said that?

  18. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    No, actually I totally agree with you. There's a fair chance that we'll overreact and get ourselves killed on the first day of contact :D Which is kind of why I wrote about needing to do the opposite :)

  19. Re:His Master's Voice on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    It is safe to assume that any technically advanced life form would be a social life form

    Or some sort of telepathic, mind-eating creatures that consume knowledge along with grey (blue?) matter. Or some sort of pheromone-producing slime that seduces other creatures into building impressive stuff for it, in order to gain sexual interest. I agree with you in principle that altruism etc. SEEM to be required to evolve beyond self-destructive behaviours. However, seeming is one thing, reality is another. We may think we're civilised and advanced and altruistic, but it could be argued that we only ever tone down the violence when it starts biting us on our own collective asses. Alcohol producing bacteria goes about its alcohol production naturally (and DUMBly) until it reaches a threshold where the amount of alcohol produced kills the bacteria itself. In essence, they drown in their self-created shit. From an outsiders' perspective, it might look like the bacteria is organised and self-regulating. Likewise, it could be argued that we look self-regulating, but are actually pretty dumb.

  20. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or you know we might also win.

    Perhaps, but I highly doubt it. I think you underestimate just how advanced another civilisation would likely be, considering the galactic scale of travel they'd have to undertake to get here, and the galactic timescales over which they might have evolved. Most likely, the culture shock would be AT LEAST as jarring for us as that which native americans faced when presented with horses, rifles, whiskey, christianity, ocean-going ships, wagons, steam trains, buffalo hunters, miners, etc. Chances are it would be MUCH worse -- probably not even conceivable to our backwater, unevolved minds.

  21. Re:For what application? on EComStation 2.0 GA To Be Released May 14 · · Score: 1

    New Voyages looks reasonably watchable (no offense, it's tough with a low budget), but (sorry) having to download the episodes piecemeal in six parts was just too off-putting. If you can't stream it (understandable), at least provide a simple torrent link; that's what bittorrent was designed for. You're probably losing a ton of potential new fans just because the downloads are too much hassle.

  22. Re:could ya... on EComStation 2.0 GA To Be Released May 14 · · Score: 1

    eCumStation 1.99 always-beta 3 patchlevel 7, Unlimited** Release (** some features only available in Complete Release)

    ?

  23. Re:For what application? on EComStation 2.0 GA To Be Released May 14 · · Score: 1

    That's true, but there are only a handful of people out there interested in buying new Windows.

    It's the installed base that forces the issue.

    Unless it's a rebel base.

  24. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    Given our history of respecting treaties? Hehheh.

  25. Re:Security through obscurity? on Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking · · Score: 1

    Hiding will never work :)

    If you can survive peacefully, out of the way in some backwater(s), while others fight amongst themselves, then you can perhaps build up sufficiently advanced technology to survive when the enemy does come knocking on your door. But probably not, since the most powerful and aggressive enemy will have conquered all the other potentials and gained their resources along the way. When the enemy comes to your door, needs more resources, and you don't want to let them in, they really are facing wartime decisions of their own needs vs. yours, even if their polite diplomacy and pretense says otherwise. They need resources, you have them, so you're a target.

    HOWEVER, that's thinking like a nation, as a collective individual that either survives or dies. In reality, nations are nothing but silly concepts. Only the individuals in those nations matter. For the individuals, it's different. Look at the Roman, Chinese, or British Empires of the past, or the US of today, for example: they're an assimilation of different powerful cultures, but all mostly taking on the culture of the strongest member in order to be accepted, rather than destroyed. There's a widely held view that China, the oldest major civilisation to survive without too much change, managed to do that not by being a great power, or by building great walls to protect its people, but actually by assimilating other cultures, and absorbing the people who wanted to invade it. This is, in fact, how all cultures managed to survive the great invaders too: not by resisting and dying, but by accepting, working with their invaders, and embracing the parts of their culture that were useful.

    In other words, if we hate them and fight them, or are just too arrogant about preferring our own ways, we'll die, just like Geronimo and Boudica did. If we like them, respect their ways, embrace their technology (not to mention their weapons), and learn quickly, then individuals will survive. If we survive and humbly share the parts of our own culture that are truly worthwhile (so ancient wisdom and poetry and farming techniques for our particular plants, probably not machine guns and religious fundamentalism), then our culture might survive, and we might just become respected community members rather than slaves, too.