Wikileaks strayed so far from its original purpose. It's no longer a wiki and around the last election, it started only publishing stuff against the US government or the Democratic party. Many of the releases weren't even leaks, they were acquired through hacking the sources.
No, that's incorrect. The policy to separate children and lock them in cages was started by the Trump administration. If you have other evidence that it was occurring during Obama, you should cite it.
The Democrats have consistently been the more inclusive party - Republicans are the ones that say the people chanting "Jews will not replace us" are "good people" so just because one member states Israel has a lot of influence doesn't make them anti-semitic.
Because/. has a large population of super-right-wing trolls that like to steer the conversation in a way that favors Republicans or Russia. You can usually tell based on their name: Anonymous Coward
Health care: Democrats are for it, want to improve it, Republicans want to make it worse, have fewer people covered.
Science: Democrats are for it, want to continue funding it, react appropriately to the results for subjects like climate change, Republicans want to defund it, think climate change is a myth
Arts: Democrats for funding it, Republicans eliminate funding for it
Immigration: Democrats are for reasonable immigration policy, Republicans for LOCKING CHILDREN in cages.
Abortion: Democrats are in favor of birth control, family planning, sex ed which reduce abortions, Republicans want to reduce access to those which are shown to increase unwanted pregnancies and abortion
Taxes: Democrats want people to pay taxes so the government can be funded, Republicans don't want rich people or corporations to pay taxes which increases deficits
It's pretty clear where the better vote is on all of these subjects.
Because the alternative is the page uses links to itself to a page that tracks the click and then uses a redirect header to send the user to the new page (or some javascript equivalent). In doing so, the actual destination is hidden from the user.
This is sort of a compromise, the link goes to the actual page, but it pings the site to let it know for link tracking purposes.
Basically, the sites are going to track the user clicking the link either way, it's just more transparent this way
To settle the charges, Office Depot has agreed to pay $25m and Support.com will pay $10m. The money will be refunded to affected customers, the FTC says.
So long as Facebook also censors minority, female, and LGBT empowerment messages I don't see a problem.
You really don't see the difference between hate speech from groups seeking to commit genocide and "LGBT empowerment message"? Well I guess right wingers aren't known to be the smartest.
I guess if he was elected to be a bad president, we deserve a bad president.
Let's not forget when Obama tried to work out compromises with Republicans on health care by picking a Republican plan, taking months to vote on Republican amendments, and then they still all voted against it. When the GOP leader said their #1 priority was to make Obama a one term president, they weren't really looking to compromise.
Arguably, the biggest contribution from Russia was getting people to not vote for Hillary. We know they had a large "troll farm" at the IRA which we don't know how much they spent on that. In the end, the numbers showed around the same number voted for Trump as for Romney, but many fewer voted for Clinton than Obama.
1. Twitter, not Google.
2. TechCrunch added the part about Cambridge Analytica - Twitter mainly said they want more money and they don't want other companies making money off their data without paying for it
You are not a customer of MySpace. You are the product. You paid nothing to store your tracks in the cloud. They did it, hoping they can sell your eyeball time.
It is not valuable anymore to MySpace. So they deleted the data you up loaded.
Guess you're really not up on how Internet services work. Usually they have a couple classes of customers - advertisers that pay them with money in exchange for them serving ads and the users who pay them with screen-space/information in exchange for using the service. If the service doesn't attract enough users, they fail. That means that they have to keep them happy just like any other customer, so all those images and videos they lost might not seem valuable on the face, but if their user customers see their data is gone and stop using the site, then their advertiser customers see the audience shrink and stop buying ads.
Think of them like a broker so you visit the site and they connect you with an advertiser. Essentially, you're paying myspace through the advertiser
All you need to vote is a driver's license, and illegals have those.
You know how I can tell you've never registered to vote?
The greatest presidential landside in US history was won by 17 million votes. There are, at least, 22 million illegals, and they practically all vote democrat. Do the maths.
You'd think with 22 million cases of voter fraud, the Republican would be able to find at least one case of it. Still waiting on that.
If the reports of Russian meddling I've seen are accurate, the scale of it was so small (tens of thousands of dollars of ads..
Those are some of the early reports that the Republicans/Russians were pushing. The biggest issue wasn't the thousands of dollars of ads, it was the stuff in TFA. Just because campaigns spend money inefficiently, doesn't mean that more efficient methods don't work
That's not even close to true. You're saying that all the other news sources in the world are controlled by the DNC, except for Fox News? Doesn't it seem more likely that they're all just reporting the news accurately?
Which stories would you consider "Fake" from the mainstream media lately? About what percentage do you think are factual? I'd guess about 99.999% but it could be higher. You seem to confuse reporting on events with reports that are fabricated. Pretty much all the things you listed were reported accurately, just there wasn't evidence to prove it.
Take for example the Kavanaugh case - there's pretty strong evidence that his accuser was telling the truth, but that's beside the point - News stories were often "Woman accuses Kavanaugh of rape". That's a true story. A woman did accuse him. We also have solid proof that Trump's campaign colluded with Russia. Stories reporting on that aren't fake
The whole FISA warrant and fake dossier paid by FusionGPS should be enough to see serious charges brought up. That should be our new Watergate, but it's not.
Here's a great example of "Fake News". We have proof that the FISA warrant wasn't because of the dossier, but your news stories probably forgot to mention that. Also, why would FusionGPS fund a "fake dossier"? That doesn't even make sense.
It wasn't originally being used "against Republicans" it was used to describe the fake news stories that people were sharing from random Wordpress sites that were things like "Hillary Clinton Runs Pedophile Ring out of Pizza Joint". Republicans (mostly Trump) then latched on to the term and started using to describe (true) stories they didn't like as a way to discredit them.
Trump was the one that got rid of net neutrality through his appointments to the FCC. Let's not pretend that he's in favor of it. If it weren't for him, we wouldn't need a bill.
I interpreted "Bringing aboard" to mean carry-on. I guess if baggage in the cargo area of an aircraft counts as something brought aboard by a passenger instead of cargo then it's ok.
Slashdot Mirror
Wikileaks strayed so far from its original purpose. It's no longer a wiki and around the last election, it started only publishing stuff against the US government or the Democratic party. Many of the releases weren't even leaks, they were acquired through hacking the sources.
No, that's incorrect. The policy to separate children and lock them in cages was started by the Trump administration. If you have other evidence that it was occurring during Obama, you should cite it.
The Democrats have consistently been the more inclusive party - Republicans are the ones that say the people chanting "Jews will not replace us" are "good people" so just because one member states Israel has a lot of influence doesn't make them anti-semitic.
Because /. has a large population of super-right-wing trolls that like to steer the conversation in a way that favors Republicans or Russia. You can usually tell based on their name: Anonymous Coward
Can you name some issues where the Republican position is better than the Democratic one? Preferably something technology/science related?
OK, let's look at some other issues:
Health care: Democrats are for it, want to improve it, Republicans want to make it worse, have fewer people covered.
Science: Democrats are for it, want to continue funding it, react appropriately to the results for subjects like climate change, Republicans want to defund it, think climate change is a myth
Arts: Democrats for funding it, Republicans eliminate funding for it
Immigration: Democrats are for reasonable immigration policy, Republicans for LOCKING CHILDREN in cages.
Abortion: Democrats are in favor of birth control, family planning, sex ed which reduce abortions, Republicans want to reduce access to those which are shown to increase unwanted pregnancies and abortion
Taxes: Democrats want people to pay taxes so the government can be funded, Republicans don't want rich people or corporations to pay taxes which increases deficits
It's pretty clear where the better vote is on all of these subjects.
For all the people that say both parties are the same, here's a clear difference in policy.
Unless you're against Net Neutrality, don't vote for the GOP next cycle
Because the alternative is the page uses links to itself to a page that tracks the click and then uses a redirect header to send the user to the new page (or some javascript equivalent). In doing so, the actual destination is hidden from the user.
This is sort of a compromise, the link goes to the actual page, but it pings the site to let it know for link tracking purposes.
Basically, the sites are going to track the user clicking the link either way, it's just more transparent this way
To settle the charges, Office Depot has agreed to pay $25m and Support.com will pay $10m. The money will be refunded to affected customers, the FTC says.
I guess all of it by the looks of things
That's pretty much the definition of "White Nationalist"
So long as Facebook also censors minority, female, and LGBT empowerment messages I don't see a problem.
You really don't see the difference between hate speech from groups seeking to commit genocide and "LGBT empowerment message"? Well I guess right wingers aren't known to be the smartest.
I guess if he was elected to be a bad president, we deserve a bad president.
Let's not forget when Obama tried to work out compromises with Republicans on health care by picking a Republican plan, taking months to vote on Republican amendments, and then they still all voted against it. When the GOP leader said their #1 priority was to make Obama a one term president, they weren't really looking to compromise.
Arguably, the biggest contribution from Russia was getting people to not vote for Hillary. We know they had a large "troll farm" at the IRA which we don't know how much they spent on that. In the end, the numbers showed around the same number voted for Trump as for Romney, but many fewer voted for Clinton than Obama.
1. Twitter, not Google.
2. TechCrunch added the part about Cambridge Analytica - Twitter mainly said they want more money and they don't want other companies making money off their data without paying for it
Paper/cardboard can also be recycled economically, but it needs to be pre-sorted. Single-stream doesn't work for that.
You are not a customer of MySpace. You are the product. You paid nothing to store your tracks in the cloud. They did it, hoping they can sell your eyeball time. It is not valuable anymore to MySpace. So they deleted the data you up loaded.
Guess you're really not up on how Internet services work. Usually they have a couple classes of customers - advertisers that pay them with money in exchange for them serving ads and the users who pay them with screen-space/information in exchange for using the service. If the service doesn't attract enough users, they fail. That means that they have to keep them happy just like any other customer, so all those images and videos they lost might not seem valuable on the face, but if their user customers see their data is gone and stop using the site, then their advertiser customers see the audience shrink and stop buying ads.
Think of them like a broker so you visit the site and they connect you with an advertiser. Essentially, you're paying myspace through the advertiser
All you need to vote is a driver's license, and illegals have those.
You know how I can tell you've never registered to vote?
The greatest presidential landside in US history was won by 17 million votes. There are, at least, 22 million illegals, and they practically all vote democrat. Do the maths.
You'd think with 22 million cases of voter fraud, the Republican would be able to find at least one case of it. Still waiting on that.
If the reports of Russian meddling I've seen are accurate, the scale of it was so small (tens of thousands of dollars of ads ..
Those are some of the early reports that the Republicans/Russians were pushing. The biggest issue wasn't the thousands of dollars of ads, it was the stuff in TFA. Just because campaigns spend money inefficiently, doesn't mean that more efficient methods don't work
That's not even close to true. You're saying that all the other news sources in the world are controlled by the DNC, except for Fox News? Doesn't it seem more likely that they're all just reporting the news accurately?
Take for example the Kavanaugh case - there's pretty strong evidence that his accuser was telling the truth, but that's beside the point - News stories were often "Woman accuses Kavanaugh of rape". That's a true story. A woman did accuse him. We also have solid proof that Trump's campaign colluded with Russia. Stories reporting on that aren't fake
The whole FISA warrant and fake dossier paid by FusionGPS should be enough to see serious charges brought up. That should be our new Watergate, but it's not.
Here's a great example of "Fake News". We have proof that the FISA warrant wasn't because of the dossier, but your news stories probably forgot to mention that. Also, why would FusionGPS fund a "fake dossier"? That doesn't even make sense.
It wasn't originally being used "against Republicans" it was used to describe the fake news stories that people were sharing from random Wordpress sites that were things like "Hillary Clinton Runs Pedophile Ring out of Pizza Joint". Republicans (mostly Trump) then latched on to the term and started using to describe (true) stories they didn't like as a way to discredit them.
There are actually strict NASA regulations on sending Face Grabbers to the ISS....just in case
But the crew will be in their sexy new spacex suits designed to contour to the seats of the tesla
Yep, I downloaded the Windows 7 calculator on Windows 10. Not only is the interface faster, but the programmer mode exists and is very useful.
It's only 3 pages long, read it yourself: https://twitter.com/SenMarkey/...
Trump was the one that got rid of net neutrality through his appointments to the FCC. Let's not pretend that he's in favor of it. If it weren't for him, we wouldn't need a bill.
I interpreted "Bringing aboard" to mean carry-on. I guess if baggage in the cargo area of an aircraft counts as something brought aboard by a passenger instead of cargo then it's ok.