Am I the only one who noticed that the Contacto article is almost word-for-word identical to this one? Can you say "press release" boys and girls?
In the interest of "fairness" here's a response to the study. A brief quote:
Summary: News outlets including CNN cited a study of several major media outlets by a UCLA political scientist and a University of Missouri-Columbia economist purporting to "show a strong liberal bias." But the study employed a measure of "bias" so problematic that its findings are next to useless, and the authors -- both former fellows at conservative think tanks cited in the study to illustrate liberal bias -- seem unaware of the substantial scholarly work that exists on the topic.
I'm sure anybody who has had a car scrapped can tell you that the scrap yard dealer will probably give you around $500 for something that was once bought for $20,000.
Really? You paid $20,000 for a pile of scrap? After all, that's what the scrap dealer bought.
Slashdot Mirror
In the interest of "fairness" here's a response to the study. A brief quote:
Homicide also had this story.
I'm sure anybody who has had a car scrapped can tell you that the scrap yard dealer will probably give you around $500 for something that was once bought for $20,000.
Really? You paid $20,000 for a pile of scrap? After all, that's what the scrap dealer bought.
oops, forgot the link: SCIAM.
Scientific American has a recent article covering much of this, including a nice sidebar explaining why redshift is not doppler related.