If you reread that amendment again, you'll see that law enforcement DOES have the right to access your information if it is REASONABLE for them to access it.
There have been several cases where evidence that was siezed that pretty much nailed the guy for doing it was rejected because the search was deemed unreasonable. This also goes for searches without warrants, like when the cops pull you over and search your person or car w/o one.
Sorry to say, but the Bill of Rights does leave that loop hole for law enforcement to get into your private life. Don't like it? Try somewhere else.
Slashdot Mirror
If you reread that amendment again, you'll see that law enforcement DOES have the right to access your information if it is REASONABLE for them to access it.
There have been several cases where evidence that was siezed that pretty much nailed the guy for doing it was rejected because the search was deemed unreasonable. This also goes for searches without warrants, like when the cops pull you over and search your person or car w/o one.
Sorry to say, but the Bill of Rights does leave that loop hole for law enforcement to get into your private life. Don't like it? Try somewhere else.