Read the news at CNN.com
The reply from General Chair (Prof. Nagib Callaos) makes sense to me. They rejected one of the bogus paper and other one was accepted on non-reviewed basis which say that Authors of the papers are the only one responsible for the contents of the paper.
I don't know what these MIT people are trying to prove. They are just being too smart unnecessarily.
Read the news at CNN.com The reply from General Chair (Prof. Nagib Callaos) makes sense to me. They rejected one of the bogus paper and other one was accepted on non-reviewed basis which say that Authors of the papers are the only one responsible for the contents of the paper. I don't know what these MIT people are trying to prove. They are just being too smart unnecessarily.