but at least i don't go all bitter and devote a website on theorising about
Instead, you are writing email with groundless insults. When I insult somebody, it is based on detailed analysis of what they write, with references and exact quotes. You just write generalities.
Take this challenge: find one statement in my site that is not true.
> It's unfortunate, because he seems to be
> a bright guy...wrong....but bright.
Can you expand on the "wrong" bit?
All you had in support is that other people
don't agree with it.
Thanks,
Yehouda Harpaz
Btw: I didn't know that two papers count as "numerous "papers"".
Instead, you are writing email with groundless insults. When I insult somebody, it is based on detailed analysis of what they write, with references and exact quotes. You just write generalities.
Take this challenge: find one statement in my site that is not true.
Btw: what is "covey" in the current context?
Can you expand on the "wrong" bit?
All you had in support is that other people don't agree with it.
Thanks,
Yehouda Harpaz
Btw: I didn't know that two papers count as "numerous "papers"".
> It's unfortunate, because he seems to be > a bright guy...wrong....but bright. Can you expand on the "wrong" bit? All you had in support is that other people don't agree with it. Thanks, Yehouda Harpaz Btw: I didn't know that two papers count as "numerous "papers"".