perhaps the oasis committee should take up the job (charging some admin fees to keep it viable) of certifying applications that are odf compliant. only those who pass get's a odf logo. that way m$ won't be able do the "embrace and extend" trick.
maybe this should have been done for html and css too!
I had the same problem with not getting higher resolution, stuck at 640x480 with an Intel built-in video. Wasted a-lot of time trying to figure out the problem... in the end, it was the BIOS. Once upgraded it worked fine.
Suggestion to W3C: a scoring system of A (green), B (orange) & C (red) to grade how a site is compliant to W3C standard. Web developer can then put up a w3c logo (with grade) on their website to announce thier compliance. Probably only those sites with A rating will want display it.
Scoring system is self-help from W3C web site. And these w3c logo is hyperlink back to w3c to verify the grade.
And hopefully this is will encourage more web devloper to write proper codes!
Slashdot Mirror
perhaps the oasis committee should take up the job (charging some admin fees to keep it viable) of certifying applications that are odf compliant. only those who pass get's a odf logo. that way m$ won't be able do the "embrace and extend" trick. maybe this should have been done for html and css too!
I had the same problem with not getting higher resolution, stuck at 640x480 with an Intel built-in video. Wasted a-lot of time trying to figure out the problem... in the end, it was the BIOS. Once upgraded it worked fine.
Suggestion to W3C: a scoring system of A (green), B (orange) & C (red) to grade how a site is compliant to W3C standard. Web developer can then put up a w3c logo (with grade) on their website to announce thier compliance. Probably only those sites with A rating will want display it. Scoring system is self-help from W3C web site. And these w3c logo is hyperlink back to w3c to verify the grade. And hopefully this is will encourage more web devloper to write proper codes!