Somehow it seems to me that evolution in its most simplistic form isn't even at the level of a scientific theory. It just says this:
Things which are not suited to their environment are more likely to be eliminated by it.
Is this really something we can debate? Can you honestly tell me that there's a better way of explaining why some things prosper and other don't, why systems adjust themselves and produce complex things intricately suited to their environments?
Slashdot Mirror
Somehow it seems to me that evolution in its most simplistic form isn't even at the level of a scientific theory. It just says this:
Is this really something we can debate? Can you honestly tell me that there's a better way of explaining why some things prosper and other don't, why systems adjust themselves and produce complex things intricately suited to their environments?