Slashdot Mirror


User: TooMuchToDo

TooMuchToDo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,400
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,400

  1. Re:Federal Mail Laws? on Deep Packet Inspection and Net Neutrality · · Score: 1
    You are correct. When I say they owned the infrastructure end to end, I meant that the postal service is taking responsibility for both accepting and delivering the item in question. On the Net, you simply hand the packets off to your upstream or peer. By the way, Fedex does a huge amount of work for the postal service handling time-critical mail (as well as mail to remote places).

    *hopes I'll have enough turbine time soon to fly for Fedex*

  2. Re:nice increase on New Ethernet Standard — Both 40 and 100 Gbps · · Score: 1
    40Gbps is from server or desktop to the switch chief. Try doing IDS/IPS on a 100Gbps link.

    I'll be able to cook eggs on my Snort box.

  3. Re:Gmail on Deep Packet Inspection and Net Neutrality · · Score: 1

    Most sites don't do HTTPS for all the traffic because of the performance hit (encryption and decryption overhead). Google can afford to do it because of it's massive amount of computing power.

  4. Re:Federal Mail Laws? on Deep Packet Inspection and Net Neutrality · · Score: 1
    Your analogy has a flaw.

    The postal service owns the entire infrastructure end to end (at least for domestic mail in the US). It's also a quasi-government entity. If I'm a Tier 1 provider (i.e. Level3, Global Crossing, etc), you don't get to call privacy rights on your packets. If it hits my network, I can look at it. Mind you, I don't want to look at your data. I really don't care about your personal info. But if I need to look at packets for some reason for debugging/technical reasons, I don't want to be hampered by legislation. You can either a) Trust that I won't look, or that if I do, I won't care about the payload or b) encrypt every damn packet. I suggest option B. Not because you shouldn't trust me, but because you shouldn't trust anyone.

  5. Re:Encryption on Deep Packet Inspection and Net Neutrality · · Score: 1

    You should save your post for a copy->paste into a NANOG thread, as I'm sure it'll come up shortly.

  6. Re:but the motherboards! on Seagate to Drop IDE Drives by Year End · · Score: 1
    Since it's a business use, under $250-300 is cheap for us....

    http://www.wcscnet.com/HdwBTRS232.htm

    $160 for a pair (so it comes down to $80 per adapater).

  7. Re:but the motherboards! on Seagate to Drop IDE Drives by Year End · · Score: 1

    My old Thinkpad T40 (pre-Lenovo) had no on-board serial, but has on-board bluetooth. I found a cheap serial adapter with bluetooth, works like a champ. Something to keep in mind if you need to move from serial device to serial device often.

  8. Re:About Emergency Power on Multiple Sites Down In SF Power Outage · · Score: 1

    When I helped a large organization get data center space, the contract stated that the average temperature couldn't exceed 85F in a 4 hour period (their request, not mine). Something to think about as more and more people are looking for colo space. I'm not saying your contract isn't up to par, as I'm sure it is for the services you're delivering. I'm just saying that customers are becoming more demanding.

  9. Re:UPS system - it's a Hytec flywheel/diesel combo on Multiple Sites Down In SF Power Outage · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, if they didn't get the Black Start feature, one of the employees has a large enough vehicle/alternator to jump start them =) I kid of course.

  10. Re:UPS system - it's a Hytec flywheel/diesel combo on Multiple Sites Down In SF Power Outage · · Score: 1

    The Bell systems were up all of the time (and had rockstar uptimes) because it was legislated that they had to. Because 911 was being served by them, they had no choice. As the net moves forward, these same requirements aren't being built into systems, and it's going to bite us in the ass someday. Hard.

  11. Re:Lots of misunderstanding here on Inside FAA's GPS-Based Air Traffic Control · · Score: 1

    The FAA is currently trying to replace VORs with GPS-direct routes. Also, with GPS/WAAS, you'll be able to fly Class 3 ILS approaches (basically, zero visibility landings).

  12. Re:keep it on Inside FAA's GPS-Based Air Traffic Control · · Score: 1

    Don't forget WAAS. That satellite provides higher accuracy over North America. And locations not covered by WAAS can use local DGPS for additional accuracy.

  13. Re:Altitude? on Inside FAA's GPS-Based Air Traffic Control · · Score: 1

    In flight terms, we call these terms AGL (above ground level) and MSL (mean sea level). Both are very important to not impacting terrain.

  14. Re:Dangerous! on Inside FAA's GPS-Based Air Traffic Control · · Score: 1

    Actually, civilian radar does ping each plane in the sky. The only thing a transponder does is allow for interrogation of the transponder number by the radar tower.

  15. Re:How does Google make money again? on Google Pledging to Bid $4.6bn to Open Spectrum · · Score: 1
    As someone who owns Google stock, let me explain how they make money:

    Ads. If you read their K-1 filing, you'll see that their only real expenses are people, servers, and real estate for people and servers. They make money hand over fist. Check out their cash flow.

  16. Re:idiots.. But it is true... on Duke Wireless Problem Caused by Cisco, not iPhone · · Score: 1

    This problem isn't restricted to Suns. In the last hosting environment I managed, all of the Cisco gear had to be hard-coded to full duplex/100Mb in the IOS, as auto-detect was busted. All of the Dell networking gear worked like a champ though. Cisco gear is overrated.

  17. Re:Don't care about the law.. fuck off! on eBay Bargains Soon To Be A Thing Of The Past? · · Score: 1

    So Person B shits themselves when the company sues anyway, right? Because you don't have to be right to sue. You just have to have more money then your opponent.

  18. Re:Not surprising on Retailers Leak New TiVo HD Specs and Price · · Score: 1

    If you're flinching at the price, they're not marketing it to you.

  19. Re:someone beat me to the overlord comment on First Robotic Drone Squadron Deployed · · Score: 2, Informative

    Communication is done using MILSAT's ultra-high-frequency burst communications I'm assuming. Extremely hard to both jam and detect who is transmitting when the transmitting is done in hostile areas.

  20. Re:Cisco on IPhones Flooding Wireless LAN At Duke · · Score: 1

    With regards to the FCC, I don't believe it to be a felony. Damages can be assessed in the high 5 figures though if you're a licensed broadcaster violating radiated RF guidelines.

  21. Re:GPS/GLONASS combo receivers available now. on US GPS, EU Galileo to Work Together · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hopefully, GLONASS will come back into full service one day (it's always good to have options, right?):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLONASS#Current_statu s

    As of May 2007, the system is not fully available, however it is maintained and remains partially operational. There were 11 operational satellites in the GLONASS system and one new satellite in its commissioning phase

    In recent years, Russia has kept the satellite orbits optimized for navigating in Chechnya, increasing signal coverage there at the cost of degrading coverage in the rest of the world. As of May 2007, GLONASS availability in Russia was 45.3% and average availability for the whole Earth was down to 30.5%, with significant areas of less than 25% availability. Meaning that, at any given time of the day in Russia, there is a 45.3% likelihood that a position fix can be calculated.

    In short, that's not exactly what I would call a "global positioning system"

  22. Re:How very... on US GPS, EU Galileo to Work Together · · Score: 2, Informative
    The signal was not degraded because of "terrorists". It was degraded to prevent the use of GPS by an enemy to guide/navigate a rocket-propelled weapon across a continent to a target with precision accuracy. This is also the reason consumer GPS devices have an upper limit on the speed and altitude information they can provide:

    http://www.gpsinformation.net/main/gpsspeed.htm

    Defense department regulations prohibit standard consumer GPS receivers from functioning above 60,000 feet and 999mph (simultaneously). Most GPS receivers seem to set hard limits at EITHER 999mph or 60,000 feet.

    However, this is all a moot point. The defense department has the ability to selectively degrade the civilian signal in certain geographic regions, while leaving the military signal as well as the civilian signal outside of that area intact (and accurate).

    Someone who is using an ICBM (or some other sort of long-range delivery system) is not going to be using GPS. They're going to be using a combination of radar, topographic map data/recognition systems, and inertial guidance (as to prevent navigation references to be screwed with during the cruise phase of the weapon in question).

  23. Re:Anything like this is a good thing on America's First Cellulosic Ethanol Plant · · Score: 1

    I hate to break it to ya, but we've already dumped huge amounts of carbon into the atmosphere that was sequestered for millions of years. Not only do we have to eliminate our CO2 output from fossil fuels, we also need a method to use renewable energy to start pulling that CO2 out of the atmosphere to sequester it again.

  24. Re:I wonder what the emissions are like? on America's First Cellulosic Ethanol Plant · · Score: 1

    But lets be honest, the waiver simply said they could pollute up to the limit permitted by law. Polluting is usually bad, but in the amounts we're talking about for the BP plant, it would be like pissing in the ocean to make it salty.

  25. Re:While it's neat as a tech demo on World's Fastest Broadband Connection — 40 Gbps · · Score: 1

    The problem is the cost to an ISP to have a multi-gigabit core. Hardware for 10GBps cores is obscenely expensive (making the per-port costs high). Until the price of the hardware drops, the price of bandwidth will be held high.