Returning to the moon was not just an exercise in getting there, Obama nixed the return to the moon because he did not come up with the directive and any achievements would not be created to him. The moon was supposed to be a testing area for new tech and new methods for a trip to mars many unique solutions could be tested making a trip to mars much easier, because much of the moon missions were based on existing tech many of the achievements would come cheaper and quicker. No matter how many milestones and other great accomplishments NASA makes there will not be a great push by students to enter those fields, the material is too tough for the masses, the sexy positions too few, and the pay too low for the other positions. Even during the CS boom in the late 90's all that came out of it were more poor programmers that didn't love what they did and didn't put forth the effort to make themselves better. The problem is that our society today has an entitlement mentality and few are willing to work hard until this is changed the number of MBA's will increase while the number of MS in science will decrease.
Are you really asking this? Yes, guns are for maiming and killing people. This is the whole point of how they are a deterrent to people who would want to harm you. If they weren't for such a purpose exactly what is the point of carrying one around?
Here are a few other reasons to carry one around
A) Hunting unless of course you are a peta nut-job who thinks animals and people are the same
B) Target shooting (some of these guns are specifically made for this task)
C) decoration (old firearms many still fire they are more valuable if they do)
More than 99% of all personal guns have never been used to kill or maim, I don't ever recall a gun manufacturer claiming their product was excellent at killing or maiming people. So almost no personal guns are used to kill or maim and gun manufactures don't advertise that their guns kill more people then any other gun, but all guns are specifically made for maiming and killing people. You sir are a dumbass!
Most intelligent people dislike this simply because the FCC created a rule and tried to enforce it, even the msnbc watchers can figure out why that is a bad idea. If we want net neutrality a law must be passed, trying to skirt the constitution is a bad idea, net neutrality is a good thing and should be a law, that way the FCC could constitutionally enforce it.
That's why I trust corporations more they don't go around saying were doing this for your own good now bend over, government on the other hand loves doing that.
Unfortunately the seniors that made this country great were sold a bill of goods that said that if they paid into the system that their health care would be taken care of when their older. If people refuse to get the mandated insurance there is a fine that is much lower then their premiums so there is no motivation to get health insurance since they have to cover you. I don't know where you live that the doctors perform unnecessary procedures to line their pockets but that is not the case in most places.
The bill has many problems, one it takes money from medicare in order to appear budget neutral, doctors will no longer get reimbursed very much for medicare because of the budget shortfall and will drop those patients. Two health benefits will not start for 4 years but the taxes will start right away again so it will appear budget neutral for 10 years. Three forcing insurance companies to take people with preexisting conditions means there is no reason to have insurance except for a fine which is much cheaper then paying for insurance. People will wait until they get cancer and then get insurance, since people will not pay into insurance until they are sick insurance companies will have two options one lose money and go out of business or two raise their rates so high to cover their loses either way this is a huge problem and will lead to the demise of insurance companies. Tort reform has other implications not only in lower premiums for doctors but many test procedures would not be needed because the doctor would not be worrying about covering their ass with unnecessary tests. Also HSA accounts which let people put money into accounts to pay for health care tax free will be eliminated, if this bill was really about making health care more affordable a program that gives people a 30%-40% savings in health care costs would not be eliminated. Luckely there are so many things in this bill that are unconstitutional (slaughter rule, forcing people to buy insurance, trumping states regulations,...) that this will not go into effect until the republicans can get this nightmare repealed.
It will become white noise just like banner adds on web-pages before add block, road signs are off to the side and are not a primary focus point if anything it will condition people to only focus on whats directly ahead of them.
Most people with common sense know if you can't see you shouldn't drive, I know that some cases are unavoidable long bridges in Florida where you're not supposed to stop are the most obvious case. The problem with this system is that it will give morons a sense of security, similar to dumb-asses in SUVs going way too fast in the snow, who think they are invincible because they have 4 wheel drive until they try to stop their 1 ton SUV and slam into something, every winter I see more SUV's off the road then anything else. This has the potential to be a great innovation hopefully GM will try to moron proof it by disabling the feature when visibility is low and the car is traveling too fast.
If a person is deemed a target for a strike they have to go through the same rules of engagement as any other target US citizen or not. You do not have the same rights on the battle field as you do in the US yes there can be mistakes but unless there is evidence of targeting civilians that are known to be innocent nothing needs to change.
See, there's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies think everyone can get along, and dicks just want to fuck all the time without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck. And all the assholes want us to shit all over everything! So, pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't fuck the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in shit!
If the Citizen is actively trying to kill Americans then they can be killed, if they pose a threat they can be eliminated. The bottom line is if a Citizen has aligned himself with the enemy then they will be treated as an enemy.
So we should send in troops to raid a stronghold to arrest a traitor risking many lives and creating a mouthpiece for opposition or we could blow up said individual. Sounds like an easy choice to me.
No moving away is correct the moon pulls the water the earth spins causing the rising water to move ahead of the moon which pulls back on the moon thus adding extra acceleration to the moon which causes it to move away.
What happens is that the moon pulls water towards itself (tides) then because the earth is spinning the tides are actually ahead of the moon which in turn pull the moon around the earth faster causing to get further away. So employing this would keep the moon where it is longer. Also the moon has a gyroscopic effect on earth and with out is earth's wobble would be more significant. So doing this would keep the moon around a little longer.
The communist way would be much better people waiting in long lines to use the only recharge station because nobody is motivated to innovate except for the threat of the trips to the gulag, I mean reeducation camp, wait no work camp.
So who exactly got stuffed into small boxes, had hypothermia induced, and were pushed against the wall, sources please and testimony from prisoners does not count.
Slashdot Mirror
I predict that the usual political sausage factory will preserve some part of Constellation. Look how long the F-22 lived on life support.
Thank God that the F-35 is on schedule so we will have some cheap Gen 4 fighters ready to deliver any day now.
Returning to the moon was not just an exercise in getting there, Obama nixed the return to the moon because he did not come up with the directive and any achievements would not be created to him. The moon was supposed to be a testing area for new tech and new methods for a trip to mars many unique solutions could be tested making a trip to mars much easier, because much of the moon missions were based on existing tech many of the achievements would come cheaper and quicker. No matter how many milestones and other great accomplishments NASA makes there will not be a great push by students to enter those fields, the material is too tough for the masses, the sexy positions too few, and the pay too low for the other positions. Even during the CS boom in the late 90's all that came out of it were more poor programmers that didn't love what they did and didn't put forth the effort to make themselves better. The problem is that our society today has an entitlement mentality and few are willing to work hard until this is changed the number of MBA's will increase while the number of MS in science will decrease.
Really?
Are you really asking this? Yes, guns are for maiming and killing people. This is the whole point of how they are a deterrent to people who would want to harm you. If they weren't for such a purpose exactly what is the point of carrying one around?
Here are a few other reasons to carry one around
A) Hunting unless of course you are a peta nut-job who thinks animals and people are the same
B) Target shooting (some of these guns are specifically made for this task)
C) decoration (old firearms many still fire they are more valuable if they do)
More than 99% of all personal guns have never been used to kill or maim, I don't ever recall a gun manufacturer claiming their product was excellent at killing or maiming people. So almost no personal guns are used to kill or maim and gun manufactures don't advertise that their guns kill more people then any other gun, but all guns are specifically made for maiming and killing people. You sir are a dumbass!
Most intelligent people dislike this simply because the FCC created a rule and tried to enforce it, even the msnbc watchers can figure out why that is a bad idea. If we want net neutrality a law must be passed, trying to skirt the constitution is a bad idea, net neutrality is a good thing and should be a law, that way the FCC could constitutionally enforce it.
That's why I trust corporations more they don't go around saying were doing this for your own good now bend over, government on the other hand loves doing that.
They'll be running for a while because that's some funny shit no matter how you make your living.
Unfortunately the seniors that made this country great were sold a bill of goods that said that if they paid into the system that their health care would be taken care of when their older. If people refuse to get the mandated insurance there is a fine that is much lower then their premiums so there is no motivation to get health insurance since they have to cover you. I don't know where you live that the doctors perform unnecessary procedures to line their pockets but that is not the case in most places.
The Death of HSA?
The bill has many problems, one it takes money from medicare in order to appear budget neutral, doctors will no longer get reimbursed very much for medicare because of the budget shortfall and will drop those patients. Two health benefits will not start for 4 years but the taxes will start right away again so it will appear budget neutral for 10 years. Three forcing insurance companies to take people with preexisting conditions means there is no reason to have insurance except for a fine which is much cheaper then paying for insurance. People will wait until they get cancer and then get insurance, since people will not pay into insurance until they are sick insurance companies will have two options one lose money and go out of business or two raise their rates so high to cover their loses either way this is a huge problem and will lead to the demise of insurance companies. Tort reform has other implications not only in lower premiums for doctors but many test procedures would not be needed because the doctor would not be worrying about covering their ass with unnecessary tests. Also HSA accounts which let people put money into accounts to pay for health care tax free will be eliminated, if this bill was really about making health care more affordable a program that gives people a 30%-40% savings in health care costs would not be eliminated. Luckely there are so many things in this bill that are unconstitutional (slaughter rule, forcing people to buy insurance, trumping states regulations, ...) that this will not go into effect until the republicans can get this nightmare repealed.
If your worried about the consequences then don't do it, it's pretty simple.
I wouldn't brag about someone taking over your root process, I just hope they didn't use the brute force method on you.
What is the clock is just slow then it's wrong all the time
Until the government bails them out again.
It will become white noise just like banner adds on web-pages before add block, road signs are off to the side and are not a primary focus point if anything it will condition people to only focus on whats directly ahead of them.
Most people with common sense know if you can't see you shouldn't drive, I know that some cases are unavoidable long bridges in Florida where you're not supposed to stop are the most obvious case. The problem with this system is that it will give morons a sense of security, similar to dumb-asses in SUVs going way too fast in the snow, who think they are invincible because they have 4 wheel drive until they try to stop their 1 ton SUV and slam into something, every winter I see more SUV's off the road then anything else. This has the potential to be a great innovation hopefully GM will try to moron proof it by disabling the feature when visibility is low and the car is traveling too fast.
If a person is deemed a target for a strike they have to go through the same rules of engagement as any other target US citizen or not. You do not have the same rights on the battle field as you do in the US yes there can be mistakes but unless there is evidence of targeting civilians that are known to be innocent nothing needs to change.
See, there's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies think everyone can get along, and dicks just want to fuck all the time without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck. And all the assholes want us to shit all over everything! So, pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't fuck the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in shit!
Guess we know which one you are.
If the Citizen is actively trying to kill Americans then they can be killed, if they pose a threat they can be eliminated. The bottom line is if a Citizen has aligned himself with the enemy then they will be treated as an enemy.
So we should send in troops to raid a stronghold to arrest a traitor risking many lives and creating a mouthpiece for opposition or we could blow up said individual. Sounds like an easy choice to me.
No moving away is correct the moon pulls the water the earth spins causing the rising water to move ahead of the moon which pulls back on the moon thus adding extra acceleration to the moon which causes it to move away.
What happens is that the moon pulls water towards itself (tides) then because the earth is spinning the tides are actually ahead of the moon which in turn pull the moon around the earth faster causing to get further away. So employing this would keep the moon where it is longer. Also the moon has a gyroscopic effect on earth and with out is earth's wobble would be more significant. So doing this would keep the moon around a little longer.
But first the Cubs have to win the world series.
Cause a forklift with 500lbs of batteries in it is never going to be misaligned and damage a car.
The communist way would be much better people waiting in long lines to use the only recharge station because nobody is motivated to innovate except for the threat of the trips to the gulag, I mean reeducation camp, wait no work camp.
So who exactly got stuffed into small boxes, had hypothermia induced, and were pushed against the wall, sources please and testimony from prisoners does not count.