Hehe, I'm surprised to read a comment like that on Slashdot. I said this on my site:
I'm fairly pleased with how the article came out, and to the best of my knowledge all the info in there's accurate, even although the way it's introduced makes it sound like I got worked up about "a missing vine" (which sounds a bit sad) rather than the entire attitude and process of historically significant pieces of animation being played around with needlessly.
Your attitude sort of sounds of the elitist type that views classical animation and the treatment of it has somehow less important than live action films, though.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not that kind of noise - "noise" is a bit misleading. DVNR removes dirt and scratches, not the grain structure.
You've missed the point. The point is that the process is being used when it's not needed and the results are poor.
Hehe, I'm surprised to read a comment like that on Slashdot. I said this on my site: I'm fairly pleased with how the article came out, and to the best of my knowledge all the info in there's accurate, even although the way it's introduced makes it sound like I got worked up about "a missing vine" (which sounds a bit sad) rather than the entire attitude and process of historically significant pieces of animation being played around with needlessly. Your attitude sort of sounds of the elitist type that views classical animation and the treatment of it has somehow less important than live action films, though.