Using your common sence is a good bet, but because some information might sound real and be false. It is a good idea to check that information from secondary source too.
I for one.. Just kidding. I don't actually see why Sun would not agree with this. But on the other hand I'm thinking from the user aspect and not corporation aspect. More developers sounds good for me, usually more and better features. But putting OO under its own foundation probably means less money for Sun?
Is'nt it somewhat obvious that a word filter would not filter out words with no 'evil' meaning?
I mean, why would google want to block people from searching fords like "deedom" if word "freedom" was to be blocked?
I would believe they would make more profit if they used the money they use for developing copy protection for actually creating better content. These protections never work anyway..
Slashdot Mirror
Using your common sence is a good bet, but because some information might sound real and be false. It is a good idea to check that information from secondary source too.
I for one.. Just kidding. I don't actually see why Sun would not agree with this. But on the other hand I'm thinking from the user aspect and not corporation aspect. More developers sounds good for me, usually more and better features. But putting OO under its own foundation probably means less money for Sun?
Is'nt it somewhat obvious that a word filter would not filter out words with no 'evil' meaning? I mean, why would google want to block people from searching fords like "deedom" if word "freedom" was to be blocked?
I would believe they would make more profit if they used the money they use for developing copy protection for actually creating better content. These protections never work anyway..
Probably for backwards compatibility, there are still some graphics-cards without OpenGL support.