The big difference with this "smidge" is battery life. But in any case, from what I've read, the 3G version won't be ready until early 2008, which gives the other guys (e.g., Samsung, Moto, LG, etc.) plenty of time to come up with a good competitor and it will already have 3G capabilities (since carriers are demanding this from the handset makers now). The big question will be: "Is the 3G iPhone late to the party?"
Fellow Poly-ite(?). I graduated with my T22 still in tact and in good condition. Poly had this program going back 6 years I think. This is nothing new.
Slashdot Mirror
The big difference with this "smidge" is battery life. But in any case, from what I've read, the 3G version won't be ready until early 2008, which gives the other guys (e.g., Samsung, Moto, LG, etc.) plenty of time to come up with a good competitor and it will already have 3G capabilities (since carriers are demanding this from the handset makers now). The big question will be: "Is the 3G iPhone late to the party?"
Clearly someone who hasn't been listening...
Did anyone else notice that the 2nd graph on page 3 and the graphs on page 4 don't match the results under them.
The graphs show the Dual Core out-performing the Quad, but the descriptions indicate how much faster the Quad is.
Sigh.. oh well. Moving on..
Fellow Poly-ite(?). I graduated with my T22 still in tact and in good condition. Poly had this program going back 6 years I think. This is nothing new.