You seem to have it figured out (even though you obviously haven't read the competetion rules and what information netflix uses for their current technique. So go give it a shot then, wiseass.
Maybe I'm missing something but it looks like there is an inadvertant loophole in the patent: "If both of the keys are zero (all 0 bits), the drive is placed in locked state. If either key is nonzero, the drive is placed in the locked state."
If the keys are zero, the drive is locked. If the keys are non-zero, the drive is locked. Therefore the drive is always locked after reset. Was this intentional? Hmmmm...
You seem to have it figured out (even though you obviously haven't read the competetion rules and what information netflix uses for their current technique. So go give it a shot then, wiseass.
Maybe I'm missing something but it looks like there is an inadvertant loophole in the patent: "If both of the keys are zero (all 0 bits), the drive is placed in locked state. If either key is nonzero, the drive is placed in the locked state." If the keys are zero, the drive is locked. If the keys are non-zero, the drive is locked. Therefore the drive is always locked after reset. Was this intentional? Hmmmm...