Re:Surpasing technologies that are not even implem
on
USB2 Specs Are In
·
· Score: 1
You wouldn't happen to think I was talking about firewire being the unused technology, would you? Even my 80 year old grand father knows USB is currently in use.
Surpasing technologies that are not even implement
on
USB2 Specs Are In
·
· Score: 1
Is it only me that finds this rather humorous that they've gone and made a technology faster than an existing one that is not even used.
I never claimed to be the one to decide, which is why I made a point to express that it was how 'I feel'. Now back to the point your were trying to make, not everything new can be used in violent ways. For example, if our scientists were to create a cure for HIV there is no posible way to use it in a violent way. To keep you from sounding unitelligent in the future I will let you in on a secret, there is no arrogance involved in understanding the limitations of mankind, now if I had tried to exclude myself from my overall opinion of our violent methods then you might have a reason to call me arrogant, otherwise it doesn't fit. Since it seems you are trying to get this thread off track of the original topic of nanotechnology, I will ignore your unlying message.
Nanotech is a scary thing, give us (humans) and new technology and what will we do with it? Find a way to use it to kill one another. So just imagine wars fought with these tiny machines, the left over bodies of millions of them will cause serious enviromental damage. Will you feel safe knowing that at any moment nanosites that have been imbedded into your body without your knowledge could start disassembling you from the inside out? All in all I feel the human race itself is not yet ready for a technology so great.
Slashdot Mirror
You wouldn't happen to think I was talking about firewire being the unused technology, would you? Even my 80 year old grand father knows USB is currently in use.
Is it only me that finds this rather humorous that they've gone and made a technology faster than an existing one that is not even used.
I never claimed to be the one to decide, which is why I made a point to express that it was how 'I feel'. Now back to the point your were trying to make, not everything new can be used in violent ways. For example, if our scientists were to create a cure for HIV there is no posible way to use it in a violent way. To keep you from sounding unitelligent in the future I will let you in on a secret, there is no arrogance involved in understanding the limitations of mankind, now if I had tried to exclude myself from my overall opinion of our violent methods then you might have a reason to call me arrogant, otherwise it doesn't fit. Since it seems you are trying to get this thread off track of the original topic of nanotechnology, I will ignore your unlying message.
Nanotech is a scary thing, give us (humans) and new technology and what will we do with it? Find a way to use it to kill one another. So just imagine wars fought with these tiny machines, the left over bodies of millions of them will cause serious enviromental damage. Will you feel safe knowing that at any moment nanosites that have been imbedded into your body without your knowledge could start disassembling you from the inside out? All in all I feel the human race itself is not yet ready for a technology so great.