Very true....and don't only speak to your own purchasing department.
Reach out to other IT organizations in cross-functional groups of the Government. You'd be surprised at the number of "agreements" software and hardware distributors and manufacturers make with the Governemtn to stay in good standing. I went to deploy a Terminal Server licensing model and when I went to check on the cost of the CAL for the licensing server I found out it was FREE from Microsoft because of a parent-level agrement made within another branch of the Government.
Oh, and you CANNOT transfer the Windows license from a Dell/HP/etc. system to a clone. It is a violation of not only the hardware manufacturers ToC but also the Microsoft EULA. It's the difference between OEM and Retail licensing when purchasing a software product.
There are two main concerns with moving into a self-created solution - standardization and support.
Standardization
Dell may load a lot of bloat-ware on their consumer level machines but for corporations or the Government the Dell X-Image process can be used to standardize the base level install. This process allows for an IT department to build a base OS standard environment applications on a single platform of hardware regardless of the equipment in use. After baselining the system the image is uploaded via a standard web interface on which you also select the hardware platforms being used in the environment - laptop, workstation, desktop, thin client, etc. Dell then takes your baseline and codes it back using their X-Image process encorporating in all necessary drivers for the models you have selected then sends it back to you. It's basically an outsourced slipstream of the OS made extremely easy by Dell. The nicest part if you are a corporation or Government entity? It's free. Contact your Dell sales rep and ask about the process. This allows for standardization not only for hardware via the same manufacturer but also for the OS and applicaitons in use on those platforms.
Support
Dell may be a P.I.T.A. for consumer level services but for corporate or Government they are right there with HP and other high-end channels. Next day replacement part shipment - or within 4 hours based on purchased support for servers - means sites do not need to keep on-hand stock of components except for maybe a few key resources for critical systems. There is also no need to train your support team on how to replace these parts as Dell will send a technician to your site with the part to perform the replacement, test the system following replacement, and take the bad part with them for return to Dell. Considering the cost of the support of the systems is built into the purchase price of the system the overhead support cost is lowered and the staff is allowed to focus on the more "fun" issues related to using Microsoft products in a large scale environment. IF you wish to have in-house parts and repair capabilities, Dell will supply on-site sparing of parts and offer training to your IT staff to perform the actual replacement of parts. The best part here? If your staff is trained and completes the warranty work in house, Dell sends you back a credit of x number of dollars per "call" - I put x as the last time I was involved in contract negotiation was 5 years ago and while it was $40 per incident at that time I would expect there has been some change in amoount.
I work for the Government as well and Dell while in my opinion as an IT professional is annoying and bothersome to say the least, and while I know I could build a better, more powerful, and more robust hardware platform for the same cost, in an environment where standardization, quick support, compatibility, and operational state of my users are all at a premium desire of the customer, I say leave the headache of those messes to upper management and Dell. It may cost up to $250 more per system to have them supplied by Dell but considering standard rate of a technician and taking into account the amount of time needing to be spent on building and deploying, then training and support, combined in with overhead costs for maintaining parts and stock, the cost difference is a loss not a gain.
OK, that works for me too, though I'll have issues because there are times I just want to look up and dream....keep in mind the description of it being the equivalent of a full moon every night.
This does away with the novice star gazer walking out into a field with a telescope, or exciting the mind of a child by explaining the constellations. Granted, even on a full moon night you can still see stars and gaze with telescopes, but it is extremely difficult to see much detail or view local celestial bodies such as Venus and Mars.
I can see a benefit in research and exploration by having the maintenance vehicles - I'm guessing there would be some unless this was the first man-made object in history that didn't need any upkeep - were able to be used to transport or hold orbit based platforms.
I just pain for the generations in the future who would never know the joy of lying back in a field on a new moon night in the middle of no where and look up and let their mind float through the cosmos.
Longer growing seasons = more irrigation = less water = Dehydration = Loss of crops Loss of livestock = More deserts = Starvation = Death
Also, don't forget about higher energy costs as week a** people put 4 AC units in their homes and cars to make up for the heat?
Unforunately reflecting from the surface would cause the heat to reflect off the inner layer of the atmosphere and bounce around. It would keep the area under the reflector's cool but not reduce the overall tempurature of the planet.
The idea of the "ring" is to bounce the heat into space before it enters the atmosphere specifically for this reason.
So rather than fixing the actual cause of the issue the brains of the world came up with this?
Granted, it is probably too late for conservation and alternative energy measures to reverse the effects of global warming, but the idea of putting together such a large project which would have world wide scope is simply outlandish. It's like having a blow out on the road and using 50 packs of gum to plug it.
OK, so it *might* work to start with but lets all remember the ISS. That was *supposed* to stand for the "International Space Station". Who picked up the brunt of the dinner check on that idea?
Let's focus the funding on alternative means of transportation and energy resources. If we *have* to build the ring, spend the $500B on the space ships and use the rest to off set clean energy production methods and the costs to the consumer, such as passing funding to the auto manufacurers for developing fully clean cars using solutions such as hydro engines (see http://www.eskimo.com/~ghawk/rotary.html for an example).
HAY! Here's a good idea for the money! Let's spend it on terra-forming Mars and move everyone there! Oh wait, let's not tell them about that cuz it will cost WAY more so they will definitely want to do it!
A-F
Slashdot Mirror
True in most circumstances but Government still needs to report a P&L at year end to the Office of Accounting.
Very true....and don't only speak to your own purchasing department.
Reach out to other IT organizations in cross-functional groups of the Government. You'd be surprised at the number of "agreements" software and hardware distributors and manufacturers make with the Governemtn to stay in good standing. I went to deploy a Terminal Server licensing model and when I went to check on the cost of the CAL for the licensing server I found out it was FREE from Microsoft because of a parent-level agrement made within another branch of the Government.
Oh, and you CANNOT transfer the Windows license from a Dell/HP/etc. system to a clone. It is a violation of not only the hardware manufacturers ToC but also the Microsoft EULA. It's the difference between OEM and Retail licensing when purchasing a software product.
Yes there is....Corporations actually perform upgrades with equipment that meets the user needs on a regular and appropriate schedule.
The Government does NOT...
There are two main concerns with moving into a self-created solution - standardization and support. Standardization Dell may load a lot of bloat-ware on their consumer level machines but for corporations or the Government the Dell X-Image process can be used to standardize the base level install. This process allows for an IT department to build a base OS standard environment applications on a single platform of hardware regardless of the equipment in use. After baselining the system the image is uploaded via a standard web interface on which you also select the hardware platforms being used in the environment - laptop, workstation, desktop, thin client, etc. Dell then takes your baseline and codes it back using their X-Image process encorporating in all necessary drivers for the models you have selected then sends it back to you. It's basically an outsourced slipstream of the OS made extremely easy by Dell. The nicest part if you are a corporation or Government entity? It's free. Contact your Dell sales rep and ask about the process. This allows for standardization not only for hardware via the same manufacturer but also for the OS and applicaitons in use on those platforms. Support Dell may be a P.I.T.A. for consumer level services but for corporate or Government they are right there with HP and other high-end channels. Next day replacement part shipment - or within 4 hours based on purchased support for servers - means sites do not need to keep on-hand stock of components except for maybe a few key resources for critical systems. There is also no need to train your support team on how to replace these parts as Dell will send a technician to your site with the part to perform the replacement, test the system following replacement, and take the bad part with them for return to Dell. Considering the cost of the support of the systems is built into the purchase price of the system the overhead support cost is lowered and the staff is allowed to focus on the more "fun" issues related to using Microsoft products in a large scale environment. IF you wish to have in-house parts and repair capabilities, Dell will supply on-site sparing of parts and offer training to your IT staff to perform the actual replacement of parts. The best part here? If your staff is trained and completes the warranty work in house, Dell sends you back a credit of x number of dollars per "call" - I put x as the last time I was involved in contract negotiation was 5 years ago and while it was $40 per incident at that time I would expect there has been some change in amoount. I work for the Government as well and Dell while in my opinion as an IT professional is annoying and bothersome to say the least, and while I know I could build a better, more powerful, and more robust hardware platform for the same cost, in an environment where standardization, quick support, compatibility, and operational state of my users are all at a premium desire of the customer, I say leave the headache of those messes to upper management and Dell. It may cost up to $250 more per system to have them supplied by Dell but considering standard rate of a technician and taking into account the amount of time needing to be spent on building and deploying, then training and support, combined in with overhead costs for maintaining parts and stock, the cost difference is a loss not a gain.
OK, that works for me too, though I'll have issues because there are times I just want to look up and dream....keep in mind the description of it being the equivalent of a full moon every night. This does away with the novice star gazer walking out into a field with a telescope, or exciting the mind of a child by explaining the constellations. Granted, even on a full moon night you can still see stars and gaze with telescopes, but it is extremely difficult to see much detail or view local celestial bodies such as Venus and Mars. I can see a benefit in research and exploration by having the maintenance vehicles - I'm guessing there would be some unless this was the first man-made object in history that didn't need any upkeep - were able to be used to transport or hold orbit based platforms. I just pain for the generations in the future who would never know the joy of lying back in a field on a new moon night in the middle of no where and look up and let their mind float through the cosmos.
Longer growing seasons = more irrigation = less water = Dehydration = Loss of crops Loss of livestock = More deserts = Starvation = Death Also, don't forget about higher energy costs as week a** people put 4 AC units in their homes and cars to make up for the heat?
OK well I have to ask since you signature had "Professor of Astronomy"..... What about the asthetic effect on the night sky?
Unforunately reflecting from the surface would cause the heat to reflect off the inner layer of the atmosphere and bounce around. It would keep the area under the reflector's cool but not reduce the overall tempurature of the planet. The idea of the "ring" is to bounce the heat into space before it enters the atmosphere specifically for this reason.
How did people get to work before SUV's?
So rather than fixing the actual cause of the issue the brains of the world came up with this? Granted, it is probably too late for conservation and alternative energy measures to reverse the effects of global warming, but the idea of putting together such a large project which would have world wide scope is simply outlandish. It's like having a blow out on the road and using 50 packs of gum to plug it. OK, so it *might* work to start with but lets all remember the ISS. That was *supposed* to stand for the "International Space Station". Who picked up the brunt of the dinner check on that idea? Let's focus the funding on alternative means of transportation and energy resources. If we *have* to build the ring, spend the $500B on the space ships and use the rest to off set clean energy production methods and the costs to the consumer, such as passing funding to the auto manufacurers for developing fully clean cars using solutions such as hydro engines (see http://www.eskimo.com/~ghawk/rotary.html for an example). HAY! Here's a good idea for the money! Let's spend it on terra-forming Mars and move everyone there! Oh wait, let's not tell them about that cuz it will cost WAY more so they will definitely want to do it! A-F