All trolls saying your "not impressed" to try and seem cool and rebellious are just retarded. Pictures don't do this case justice. The attention to detail on this case is amazing, it is the most well constructed case I've ever seen and seeing all this in person also makes it look way better. Not to mention the silent version of this case is one of the quietest versions you can buy.
This is the best case you can buy if you can afford it.
This article is clearly brought on by a bunch of linux fanbois trying to put value to their miserable lives be creating some great conflict they think they need to correct.
MS would not do that.
Evidence evidence evidence. I hear this so much, why the hell do we need evidence? Whatever happened to just thinking about it? Have we lost so much faith in our ability to think that we can no longer rely on it? There is such a thing as logical reasoning. For example take this: 2 + X = 5
Why do we need evidence to figure out X when we can simply use logical reason to figure it out? In order for it to equal 5, that X must be a 3! I didn't use evidence, I just looked at what there is and from that formed a rather good guessing on what the missing variable is.
This is exactly what the philosophy of Deism does, something ecompassed by the term "Intelligent Design". No, there is no solid evidence used in the deism philosophy, but it is not exactly a braindead philosophy that was created to prove gods existance simply for the sake of god existing. After thinking about the world logically for long enough, it was concluded that because of how nature is, it was most likely not pure random.
creationism is not intelligent design. Intelligent Deisgn has absolutely nothing to do with religion.
It somewhat distrubs me that the original poster of this article felt it necessary to turn "Intelligent Design" into "Creationism". I imagine he had to of known the difference, but since creationism is much more easily dismissed he decided to use that word instead of the word Bush actually used. Clever wording to help prove a point? I think so. Rather sad.
Whats even more sad is that most people on here arent even wise enough to know the difference and ridicule the ones that are and attempted to point it out. I suppose I could explain it thoroughly, but I'll just say that Intelligent Design also emcompasses Deism, which is where it becomes radically different than creationism. Give deism a little google.
Judging by this I really do think it is necessary for Intelligent Design to be taught in schools, clearly all of you would of benefited from it seeing as so many of you are so ignorant to what it is.
Slashdot Mirror
All trolls saying your "not impressed" to try and seem cool and rebellious are just retarded. Pictures don't do this case justice. The attention to detail on this case is amazing, it is the most well constructed case I've ever seen and seeing all this in person also makes it look way better. Not to mention the silent version of this case is one of the quietest versions you can buy. This is the best case you can buy if you can afford it.
This article is clearly brought on by a bunch of linux fanbois trying to put value to their miserable lives be creating some great conflict they think they need to correct. MS would not do that.
Evidence evidence evidence. I hear this so much, why the hell do we need evidence? Whatever happened to just thinking about it? Have we lost so much faith in our ability to think that we can no longer rely on it? There is such a thing as logical reasoning. For example take this: 2 + X = 5
Why do we need evidence to figure out X when we can simply use logical reason to figure it out? In order for it to equal 5, that X must be a 3! I didn't use evidence, I just looked at what there is and from that formed a rather good guessing on what the missing variable is.
This is exactly what the philosophy of Deism does, something ecompassed by the term "Intelligent Design". No, there is no solid evidence used in the deism philosophy, but it is not exactly a braindead philosophy that was created to prove gods existance simply for the sake of god existing. After thinking about the world logically for long enough, it was concluded that because of how nature is, it was most likely not pure random.
creationism is not intelligent design. Intelligent Deisgn has absolutely nothing to do with religion. It somewhat distrubs me that the original poster of this article felt it necessary to turn "Intelligent Design" into "Creationism". I imagine he had to of known the difference, but since creationism is much more easily dismissed he decided to use that word instead of the word Bush actually used. Clever wording to help prove a point? I think so. Rather sad. Whats even more sad is that most people on here arent even wise enough to know the difference and ridicule the ones that are and attempted to point it out. I suppose I could explain it thoroughly, but I'll just say that Intelligent Design also emcompasses Deism, which is where it becomes radically different than creationism. Give deism a little google. Judging by this I really do think it is necessary for Intelligent Design to be taught in schools, clearly all of you would of benefited from it seeing as so many of you are so ignorant to what it is.