there was one episode which took place on "sky clearance day" when ZikZak shot down all its disused satelites. Chunks were shown actually hitting the ground, too, which'd be a lot cooler.
isn't that the point of good COMPILERS these days?
Nope. The point of good compilers is world domination. The point of not-so-good compilers is to serve quality coffee at an affordable price. Any questions?
Uh.... FYI I (poster) am double majoring in solid state physics and microelectronics. Hard to do that under a rock. The whole point was that packages DON'T look like the chip inside. If you can arrange so that they do, not have the chip overheat plus interface to it, you can cram components that would fill larger rooms, you are my hero.
Linux fundamentally relies on 30-year-old operating system technology and architecture. This is not the least of linux's problems. Linux fundamentaly is meant to run on "computers" which trace their modern form back to the fourties, and can be traced earlier than that in concepts. These computers run on "elecricity" which has existed for several billion years. The only way to be certain that your computer is up to par with today's technology is to rely on an up-to-the-minute marketing department. "windows" has a nice ring to it, don't you think? Try and connect that to any ideas more than 5 years old.... Although some punkass at MIT stole the word "windows" and prefixed with an X, it is still a cutting-edge concept thanks to microsoft. Plus they did him one better and added 2 letters instead of one. Trust ingenuity, trust microsoft.
there was one episode which took place on "sky clearance day" when ZikZak shot down all its disused satelites. Chunks were shown actually hitting the ground, too, which'd be a lot cooler.
A 3 inch platter rotating at the speed of light would be doing 3.183e7 rpms. So, no faster than that.
Voice and handwriting req
They didn't have links to any of those utilities in their "related websites" section. Is that bad journalism or what?
then you'd make a big deal of $3(0//D P0$7
isn't that the point of good COMPILERS these days?
Nope. The point of good compilers is world domination. The point of not-so-good compilers is to serve quality coffee at an affordable price. Any questions?
Kinda reminds me of the time they wanted to bore a few miles deep into Kansas, set off an H-bomb every hour and trap the heat.
Uh.... FYI I (poster) am double majoring in solid state physics and microelectronics. Hard to do that under a rock. The whole point was that packages DON'T look like the chip inside. If you can arrange so that they do, not have the chip overheat plus interface to it, you can cram components that would fill larger rooms, you are my hero.
Linux fundamentally relies on 30-year-old operating system technology and architecture. This is not the least of linux's problems. Linux fundamentaly is meant to run on "computers" which trace their modern form back to the fourties, and can be traced earlier than that in concepts. These computers run on "elecricity" which has existed for several billion years. The only way to be certain that your computer is up to par with today's technology is to rely on an up-to-the-minute marketing department. "windows" has a nice ring to it, don't you think? Try and connect that to any ideas more than 5 years old.... Although some punkass at MIT stole the word "windows" and prefixed with an X, it is still a cutting-edge concept thanks to microsoft. Plus they did him one better and added 2 letters instead of one. Trust ingenuity, trust microsoft.