EXACTLY!
This whole Apple antitrust thing is confused from the beginning. People are confusing the definition of monopoly with the definition of popularity.
Ok, flip the script from the plaintiff's standpoing. I have an iPod. I want to play music from Napster which uses WMA+[Microsoft's DRM]. I can't because a) There are no OS X apps from this company (or any other for that matter) to interface with my iPod b) by your definition, Napster is a monopoly in my case.
Slashdot Mirror
EXACTLY! This whole Apple antitrust thing is confused from the beginning. People are confusing the definition of monopoly with the definition of popularity.
Ok, flip the script from the plaintiff's standpoing. I have an iPod. I want to play music from Napster which uses WMA+[Microsoft's DRM]. I can't because a) There are no OS X apps from this company (or any other for that matter) to interface with my iPod b) by your definition, Napster is a monopoly in my case.
See how silly this whole thing is?