Slashdot Mirror


User: yasgo

yasgo's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:Hmmm.... on Web 2.0 Recipes With PHP + DHTML · · Score: 1

    ... and is any of this stuff Search Engine friendly, or just something else that can inadvertantly get your site banned from Google?

  2. Re:Uninteresting content gets undeserved attention on NewsWeek Looks at Search Engine Optimization · · Score: 1

    Errr, PageRank is a number between 0 and 10 that Google uses in their little toolbar doo-dad. The number gets bigger the more sites link to you.

    PageRank has virtually nothing at all to do with the Position of a site in the results. Position comes from over 100 factors about a page that Google measures and sorts, PageRank being just one of those factors.

    Maybe you should learn what these technical terms mean before commenting on them next time?

  3. Re:What's the point? on mTLD to enforce Web standards in .mobi · · Score: 1

    UK users pay the equivalent of more than 3 US Dollars per Megabyte when using a handheld mobile device to access the Internet. Consumers do not want to be paying that sort of money to access sites that they cannot then use.

    I would want a refund on my phone bill from the network operator if my device was fed a load of junk and they tried to bill me for it even though I could not use it, and I am sure some scam would soon ensue....

  4. Re:Recoding a web site in CSS on 10 Best Resources for CSS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't code a site in CSS. The content still uses HTML.

    The CSS styles that content.

    Instead of div hell you should code the content using semantic blocks: headings (to introduce sections of the page), lists (for lists of items), forms, paragraphs (for most of the normal content), and tables (for your tabular data)

  5. Re:"The best part: on 125-Mile WiFi Connection · · Score: 1

    >>> ...yesterday afternoon they said that they expect this rig would work at distances of over 300 miles." NASA's shuttles orbit at an altitude between 200K-250K miles... >> So Team iFibre Redwire only has another 199,700 - 247,000 miles to smash before we are all spammed from space. Wrong. It is only 200 miles. You can already find plenty of Ham people that communicated from Earth to Shuttle, ISS (and Mir in the past) using 1 Watt of VHF or UHF FM voice communications and simple antenna. So 0.3 Watts and a biggger aerial is still easy for line of sight - diificult part for communicating with space is moving the aerial to follow the orbiting object (the closer it is the faster it moves).