And I also wonder why the article refers to authoritities (i.e the judges) as if they were something to rely on. This is called to argument ad verecundiam and has got nothing to do in an article. What matters in an article is the arguments that the writer come up with... I say; if I said something like this; "Win98 must be good, 'cause BillG says so."; would anyone take me seriosly? I really do not hope so...
actually, I think that was how the code to win98 was made... (and unfortunately, I've heard that they were thinking of cloning BillG to aqcire win00 We sure knew he was a zero, but a doublezero... Oh well, that's only logical I presume...)
Slashdot Mirror
And I also wonder why the article refers to authoritities (i.e the judges) as if they were something to rely on. This is called to argument ad verecundiam and has got nothing to do in an article. What matters in an article is the arguments that the writer come up with... I say; if I said something like this; "Win98 must be good, 'cause BillG says so."; would anyone take me seriosly? I really do not hope so...
actually, I think that was how the code to win98 was made... (and unfortunately, I've heard that they were thinking of cloning BillG to aqcire win00 We sure knew he was a zero, but a doublezero... Oh well, that's only logical I presume...)