You, sir, are a slight idiot.
Please learn to spell, it's distracts the read from your point, which is just another conspiracy theory.
Knowledge is only power if you have some way to use it. Yes, google servers have alot of information, but I doubt the 36,000 thousand pages of electricity equations or the 80,000 pages of lists of hotel workers will ever put an innocent man to death.
"For all we know," Google simply amasses data. I'd rather support an innovative company and give it the benefit of the doubt because that is an attitude will benefit everyone.
No entity like Google will ever have absolute power, and and corruption exists far apart from it's data centers. You are more likely to learn about a businessman by using a little 'social engineering' on the right people than you are at a keyboard.
That you assume Google has become sinister shows that, even if someone proved Google was all-pure, you would still be suspicious. This isn't... logical.
And if you're worried about THEM finding your 'dirty big/little secrets' maybe that's an indication you shouldn't have them.
To those that would flame me for flaming Stevix, I would ask you to consider what single-mindness does for everyone. I understand the need for public review of private entities. I know corruption exists, but it tends to cause it's own end. I'm only suggestion moderation is the recipe for healthy speculation.
Slashdot Mirror
Ah. I can relate. My argument lies with what you meant, really. have a nice day.
Moby Dick was a sperm whale. I think we have yet another clever author
You, sir, are a slight idiot. Please learn to spell, it's distracts the read from your point, which is just another conspiracy theory. Knowledge is only power if you have some way to use it. Yes, google servers have alot of information, but I doubt the 36,000 thousand pages of electricity equations or the 80,000 pages of lists of hotel workers will ever put an innocent man to death. "For all we know," Google simply amasses data. I'd rather support an innovative company and give it the benefit of the doubt because that is an attitude will benefit everyone. No entity like Google will ever have absolute power, and and corruption exists far apart from it's data centers. You are more likely to learn about a businessman by using a little 'social engineering' on the right people than you are at a keyboard. That you assume Google has become sinister shows that, even if someone proved Google was all-pure, you would still be suspicious. This isn't ... logical.
And if you're worried about THEM finding your 'dirty big/little secrets' maybe that's an indication you shouldn't have them.
To those that would flame me for flaming Stevix, I would ask you to consider what single-mindness does for everyone. I understand the need for public review of private entities. I know corruption exists, but it tends to cause it's own end. I'm only suggestion moderation is the recipe for healthy speculation.