These are exactly the questions that need to be asked. Of course, they are simply dismissed as "silliness."
You're absolutely right; all of the mathematics of the original post are constrained to a very specific (and very complex) system, based upon monstrous, unsupported assumptions.
Evolutionists always argue accordingly: "You can't say that something couldn't come from nothing just because we don't know that yet!" Putting in place as much faith as any of their religious counterparts. Yes, the Big Bang is built entirely upon faith.
You're spot on by pointing to the "first amino acid." Let's all - by faith - assume that this universe burst into being from absolutely nothing. With a universe full of inorganic matter, how did that matter spring to life, much less organize itself into amino acids or DNA? Billions upon billions of years don't answer that question.
Slashdot Mirror
These are exactly the questions that need to be asked. Of course, they are simply dismissed as "silliness."
You're absolutely right; all of the mathematics of the original post are constrained to a very specific (and very complex) system, based upon monstrous, unsupported assumptions.
Evolutionists always argue accordingly: "You can't say that something couldn't come from nothing just because we don't know that yet!" Putting in place as much faith as any of their religious counterparts. Yes, the Big Bang is built entirely upon faith.
You're spot on by pointing to the "first amino acid." Let's all - by faith - assume that this universe burst into being from absolutely nothing. With a universe full of inorganic matter, how did that matter spring to life, much less organize itself into amino acids or DNA? Billions upon billions of years don't answer that question.
Improbable is an understatement.