Sure you can throw money at the existing corrupt goverments and what not, but its difficult to teach an old dog new tricks. By educating the children you ensure that the countries future is more secure... sure the end result takes longer to achieve but its a more permanent fix to the problem.
1. you said it... if mail is delayed for 12 hours then it is coming from a broken server. I tell my client that the reason their mail took so long to get through was because the person who sent it is using a broken mailserver... not my problem.
2.Greylisting should be used with rbl's. Even if you use conservative rbls you don't have this problem.
3.Maybe.. although I have never seen a clog happening because of greylisting.
I don't know why more people don't use greylisting. It really works wonders. Its reduced our spam by about 99%.. and if there is a false positive, its because the sending server is not rfc compliant. Ok so it delays mail initially for 5 minutes... big deal, its a small price to pay for virtually no spam AND no administration of a spam filter.
Microsoft has almost infinate resources and yet they can not develop a browser that is nearly as good as other browsers written by volunteers.
Obviously they need to rewrite from scratch... In the mean time I will stick to firefox!
5. learn how to us html in slashdot posting
1. become patent attorney 2. design product and patent it. 3. make law to force manufactures to buy product 4. PROFIT!! 5. ????
Sure you can throw money at the existing corrupt goverments and what not, but its difficult to teach an old dog new tricks. By educating the children you ensure that the countries future is more secure... sure the end result takes longer to achieve but its a more permanent fix to the problem.
Do you love it as much as mysql's root/(null) feature?
:-)
before you mod me troll know that I am posting from my Linux laptop
1. you said it... if mail is delayed for 12 hours then it is coming from a broken server. I tell my client that the reason their mail took so long to get through was because the person who sent it is using a broken mailserver... not my problem. 2.Greylisting should be used with rbl's. Even if you use conservative rbls you don't have this problem. 3.Maybe.. although I have never seen a clog happening because of greylisting.
I don't know why more people don't use greylisting. It really works wonders. Its reduced our spam by about 99%.. and if there is a false positive, its because the sending server is not rfc compliant. Ok so it delays mail initially for 5 minutes... big deal, its a small price to pay for virtually no spam AND no administration of a spam filter.
Microsoft has almost infinate resources and yet they can not develop a browser that is nearly as good as other browsers written by volunteers. Obviously they need to rewrite from scratch... In the mean time I will stick to firefox!