This shows some interesting trends. First off, it looks as though the greatest retreat in recent history was during the 1940s. The page goes on to say that there was a bit of an advance during the 1990's but that 2002/2003 were very warm winters and there was a great deal of retreat then.
When I go to sites showing retreat, a lot of them show data from the 2002/2003 cycle. I think both sides are cherry picking.
I'm sure human kind is responsible for some part of climate change, but I believe that other forces are at work as well, and may be more important than Greenhouse gasses. I think we should focus resources on adapting to those forces and I do believe a strong economy will be the backbone of this adaptation.
http://www.cicero.uio.no/fulltext.asp?id=3561&lang =en
t s.htm
/ zurich.gif
This shows some interesting trends. First off, it looks as though the greatest retreat in recent history was during the 1940s. The page goes on to say that there was a bit of an advance during the 1990's but that 2002/2003 were very warm winters and there was a great deal of retreat then.
When I go to sites showing retreat, a lot of them show data from the 2002/2003 cycle. I think both sides are cherry picking.
Interestingly the 2002/2003 retreat is reflected in the susnspot cycle:
http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/sunspo
Oh -- and if you look at the sunspot cycles from 1750 to present there seems to be an overall increase in activity: http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/images
I'm sure human kind is responsible for some part of climate change, but I believe that other forces are at work as well, and may be more important than Greenhouse gasses. I think we should focus resources on adapting to those forces and I do believe a strong economy will be the backbone of this adaptation.