Yes, let's see... Instead of sending the typical 99% of FBI replies to Congressional inquiries on open cases ("no comment"), David Szady, the head of FBI's counterintelligence (not the field office), says "We are aggressively pursuing the leads provided by Mr. Carpenter." Hmmm... Sounds fairly important to me if the head of FBI's counterintelligence takes time to reply instead of the field office. Ok, let's take a moment to reflect on the readers that buy TIME magazine. What?! They aren't all programmers or network security analysts? You've got to be kidding me. Of the 30 million readers of TIME, I'm utterly shocked that the article was "devoid" of technical content. Are these editors on crack or something? There definitely should have been a step by step discourse on how to reprogram flash memory in the piece -- again, I am completely taken aback. TIME is sort of like the National Enquirer or the Mirror, isn't it? They don't do much vetting of their stories, they just publish whatever some Tom Dick and Harry strolls in with if it will sell magazines, by God. And then we have the previous well-sourced pieces by Frank Tiboni of FCW and the front page Washington Post story by Bradley Graham. Where do they find these morons?! Puhhleeeeeasssssssseeeee....
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, let's see... Instead of sending the typical 99% of FBI replies to Congressional inquiries on open cases ("no comment"), David Szady, the head of FBI's counterintelligence (not the field office), says "We are aggressively pursuing the leads provided by Mr. Carpenter." Hmmm... Sounds fairly important to me if the head of FBI's counterintelligence takes time to reply instead of the field office. Ok, let's take a moment to reflect on the readers that buy TIME magazine. What?! They aren't all programmers or network security analysts? You've got to be kidding me. Of the 30 million readers of TIME, I'm utterly shocked that the article was "devoid" of technical content. Are these editors on crack or something? There definitely should have been a step by step discourse on how to reprogram flash memory in the piece -- again, I am completely taken aback. TIME is sort of like the National Enquirer or the Mirror, isn't it? They don't do much vetting of their stories, they just publish whatever some Tom Dick and Harry strolls in with if it will sell magazines, by God. And then we have the previous well-sourced pieces by Frank Tiboni of FCW and the front page Washington Post story by Bradley Graham. Where do they find these morons?! Puhhleeeeeasssssssseeeee....