And a vlan for every MAC == at least a/30 (unless I am missing something here).
Even on an RFC1918 network this seems to be a waste especially if it is a large NAT'd network.
Ford keys use(d) the first 4 or 5 notches for the door and the last 4 or 5 for the ignition (or vice versa). The locks also only use one side of the double sided key. We had a few Fords and would cut one side of the key for one truck and the other side for another.
Untrue!! http://www.arrangebypenis.com/
And a vlan for every MAC == at least a /30 (unless I am missing something here).
Even on an RFC1918 network this seems to be a waste especially if it is a large NAT'd network.
They are all on VLAN 1 aren't they?
This would simply not scale. It isn't a consideration of money but of available resources on the routers.
Ford keys use(d) the first 4 or 5 notches for the door and the last 4 or 5 for the ignition (or vice versa). The locks also only use one side of the double sided key. We had a few Fords and would cut one side of the key for one truck and the other side for another.
I hear "backbone CVS" is harder to "Trac".
In a world where ACLs were free but we live in the real world where ACLs consume memory and processor.