After reading some of those most ignorant speech in my life, a typical Bush speech, i feel obligated to say something wtihout an 1800s biased attitude towards women. Where do i begin to attack something as ill-spoken as
"Also from a guy's point of view: you make one mistake by not pulling out in time and end up supporting a woman and brat for the next 18 years with her yelling at you for not doing enough because you've 'only' been working all day and then kept up all night by some brat screaming."
Where you born an orphan? Did your father dump you in a mcdonalds trashcan leading to some sextist bigot picking you up to continue his wrath of misogynism? Is this brat reminiscent of yourself or do you just pull this idea from some Japanese subordination film. Don't say a guy's point of view because you represent stupidity and ignorance. Mike and Ike here need to go out in the real world and see that it's not all Amish anymore. "I do hope, for your husband's sake, that you're not bitchy all the time and you're just in a bad mood at the moment." I hope for your sake you speak to girls that arnt on cartoons or suicide hotlines. I'm not a parent and im not a female....im not even that old but you make it sound like im an extremist for women when really i just believe in common ideals that most people in this society comprehend. I cant oppose your arguemnt, as much as i'd like to, because you have none.
"That may be true nowadays, but I'm gonna be a little un-PC here. Women used to readily accept their roles as the main bringer-uppers of children, and looker-afters of the home (them being generally more skilled than men at these tasks)."
Single-dumb male-bigot....i think i got those stats right. Your basically implying that your an idiot if you dont know how to take care of a child(by the way i love that word bringer-uppers, it really shows the intelligence behind your speech. Women accepted roles that were available to them, as they do now. Which is why Hilary Clinton was intimating running for presidenc. They accepted the only roles given to them as caretakers but if you think a woman can easily raise a child alone, your missing some knowledge that children learn from watching the discovery channel. Fathers are mutually significant as a parent and maybe considered even more so becasue they conventionally teach them discipline and a persons limits. Caretaking is an acquired ability as isnt instinctive in either gender, which is why social services visit women and men.
I wont argue further here because i prefer real-time chats instead of this email type of correspondency. You can find me in IRC irc://irc.freenode.net/methlabs and i can teach you history on how all people have unalienable rights, and people arent born stupid theyre just docile, etc...
Slashdot Mirror
After reading some of those most ignorant speech in my life, a typical Bush speech, i feel obligated to say something wtihout an 1800s biased attitude towards women. Where do i begin to attack something as ill-spoken as "Also from a guy's point of view: you make one mistake by not pulling out in time and end up supporting a woman and brat for the next 18 years with her yelling at you for not doing enough because you've 'only' been working all day and then kept up all night by some brat screaming." Where you born an orphan? Did your father dump you in a mcdonalds trashcan leading to some sextist bigot picking you up to continue his wrath of misogynism? Is this brat reminiscent of yourself or do you just pull this idea from some Japanese subordination film. Don't say a guy's point of view because you represent stupidity and ignorance. Mike and Ike here need to go out in the real world and see that it's not all Amish anymore. "I do hope, for your husband's sake, that you're not bitchy all the time and you're just in a bad mood at the moment." I hope for your sake you speak to girls that arnt on cartoons or suicide hotlines. I'm not a parent and im not a female....im not even that old but you make it sound like im an extremist for women when really i just believe in common ideals that most people in this society comprehend. I cant oppose your arguemnt, as much as i'd like to, because you have none. "That may be true nowadays, but I'm gonna be a little un-PC here. Women used to readily accept their roles as the main bringer-uppers of children, and looker-afters of the home (them being generally more skilled than men at these tasks)." Single-dumb male-bigot....i think i got those stats right. Your basically implying that your an idiot if you dont know how to take care of a child(by the way i love that word bringer-uppers, it really shows the intelligence behind your speech. Women accepted roles that were available to them, as they do now. Which is why Hilary Clinton was intimating running for presidenc. They accepted the only roles given to them as caretakers but if you think a woman can easily raise a child alone, your missing some knowledge that children learn from watching the discovery channel. Fathers are mutually significant as a parent and maybe considered even more so becasue they conventionally teach them discipline and a persons limits. Caretaking is an acquired ability as isnt instinctive in either gender, which is why social services visit women and men. I wont argue further here because i prefer real-time chats instead of this email type of correspondency. You can find me in IRC irc://irc.freenode.net/methlabs and i can teach you history on how all people have unalienable rights, and people arent born stupid theyre just docile, etc...