Boing-boing probably isn't violating your copyright. If they have used a compressed, low quality version of the photo and are using it for commentary, it would fall under fair use.
MIT's open courseware, in economics, is underwhelming. There is much more material available elsewhere and most professors have at least as extensive sites. I think this is mostly MIT grabbing publicity for content ordinarily available online.
Slashdot Mirror
Boing-boing probably isn't violating your copyright. If they have used a compressed, low quality version of the photo and are using it for commentary, it would fall under fair use.
MIT's open courseware, in economics, is underwhelming. There is much more material available elsewhere and most professors have at least as extensive sites. I think this is mostly MIT grabbing publicity for content ordinarily available online.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=434
it is fixed.
Actually, a Jan '09 option with a strike price of $600 was worth $57.50 at the close today, but it did fall $11 today. See
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/op?s=GOOG&m=2009-01
My apologies.
You may find this article (which I wrote) interesting: http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol1/iss2/art4/ It compares the fraud threat to eBay to the collapse of Enron.