Maybe we can get the Slash guys to incorporate a feature that would let the registered userbase label a submission a duplicate.
Once a certain number of users have done that, the two articles in question will be merged, one will be removed or something.
Something must be done, cuz I'm tired of all this complaining everytime it happens, but nothing gets done.
Doing something like this will keep Slashdot relevant, in an age where 2.0 rules the Net.
One post letting everyone know this is a duplicate is enough.
What's the big deal with duplicates anyhow? If someone didn't see it yesterday, they'll see it now, and if someone _did_ see it yesterday; they don't have to RTFA, ya know?
Does this mark the end for Apple?
That sounds like a good idea.
Maybe we can get the Slash guys to incorporate a feature that would let the registered userbase label a submission a duplicate.
Once a certain number of users have done that, the two articles in question will be merged, one will be removed or something.
Something must be done, cuz I'm tired of all this complaining everytime it happens, but nothing gets done.
Doing something like this will keep Slashdot relevant, in an age where 2.0 rules the Net.
Let's do something! Yesterday!
Groundhog Day was a good movie, man!
One post letting everyone know this is a duplicate is enough.
What's the big deal with duplicates anyhow? If someone didn't see it yesterday, they'll see it now, and if someone _did_ see it yesterday; they don't have to RTFA, ya know?
I totally argee with you!
:D
This standard is gonna ROCK!
I honestly consider the non-maintream-ness of Linux to be partially attributable to the messy filesystem.
I know it's inherited from old UNIX, but hey:
'Program Files' is way better than '/usr/local'!